Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The South Dakota Sioux Reservation Vote--D'asshole's letter to the WSJ
The Wall Street Journal ^ | Wednesday, November 20, 2002 | Sen. Tom Daschle

Posted on 11/20/2002 6:19:59 AM PST by TroutStalker

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:47:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: T. P. Pole
Given the living conditions and South Dakota's unpredictable weather, voting Indians absentee is the only practical way.
Clifford Scott
Former Chair
South Dakota Democrat Party

"Does that phrase seem funny to anyone else? Almost sounds non-PC."
The Observant
T.P. Pole

It almost sounds like a Freudian slip. As in "you gotta vote those Indians absentee to make sure they vote...and vote 'right'".

In fact, it almost certainly is a Freudian slip, recalling all those tactical sessions concerned with "getting out the vote" that Mr. Scott attended in his former role.

As such, it is repulsively condescending and patronizing. The Oglala Sioux are clearly considered Democrat chattel, confined to that great liberal plantation on the plains.

Excellent catch. Scott and the South Dakota Democrats are caught out, right there on the pages of the Wall Street Journal.

21 posted on 11/20/2002 8:25:02 AM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: okie01
The WSJ has deep pockets. Mr Scott and Mr Daschle better hope everything was on the up and up because they have just invited the WSJ to South Dakota.
22 posted on 11/20/2002 8:31:46 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
So what can minorities expect from the editorial right in this country? To be ignored when the right's candidates win, and blamed when those candidates lose?

Or, to put it another way, what can we expect from the editorial left in this country (read "the media in this country")? A month long feeding frenzy which produces no evidence of voter fraud when the right's candidates win, and an immediate dismissal and subject change when those candidates lose?

23 posted on 11/20/2002 9:08:59 AM PST by WaveThatFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Yes!And John Fund has this high up on his list.
24 posted on 11/20/2002 10:32:42 AM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Contrary to Mr. Daschle, in the 2000 Florida election minority turnout was much higher than normal. I forget the exact numbers but if there had been the normal minority turnout in FL in 2000, G.W. Bush would have won the state by several hundred thousand votes.
25 posted on 11/20/2002 10:37:24 AM PST by WarrenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
All the more reason to turn the issue to racism against Indians.

The racism "smoke" obscures the vote fraud "fire."

Of course, mentioning smoke and fire in the same thread as indians makes me a racist too...
26 posted on 11/20/2002 10:40:15 AM PST by 5by5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
" Missing only was some mention of "firewater."

That Omission should be corrected.:

"The DemocRAT vote on the reservations was further enhanced by promises of heap big firewater for all those who vote for Johnson."

27 posted on 11/20/2002 10:49:39 AM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WarrenC
Actually, the minority turnout was not unusually high, relative to the non-minority. The erroneous information was based on the same bad exit polls that gave the state to Gore. Florida codes voters by race, so when the actual figures came out, black voting (casting a ballot, counted or not) as a PERCENTAGE OF REGISTERED VOTERS was about 4% lower than the state average.
28 posted on 11/20/2002 12:56:00 PM PST by BohDaThone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
"Consider another close race, South Dakota's Senate election in 2002. Again we have a 500-plus margin (out of only 330,000 votes cast). A problem for you? Very much so, because on this occasion your candidate lost. Yet now minority voting, disregarded in Florida, is announced to be the culprit. You believe Oglala Sioux voting in Shannon County was "fishy." That's about it: no evidence, no basis whatsoever for the claim, and an omission of the fact that South Dakota's Republican attorney general and Republican secretary of state found no grounds for any such suggestion of fraud. What your readers are offered instead is an outright slur on our Indian voting community, complete with snide stereotypical references to "smoke signals." Missing only was some mention of "firewater." Goodness. Whoa! How about buildingSomebodysaveAmericaandvotethisguyoutofoffice.com. Good grief...he's makes decisions that impact our lives. I didn't vote for him. South Dakota has no right to put someone in office who appears so unstable.
29 posted on 11/20/2002 2:41:28 PM PST by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
He was too busy being "disappointed".

God if we only could DIS-APPOINT him.

30 posted on 11/20/2002 3:33:31 PM PST by Don Corleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker; Howlin; Liz; Mudboy Slim
...nonetheless has been very disconcerting to the Indians.

Check out Puff and his goons. Since when is 'indians' PC?

31 posted on 11/20/2002 4:10:54 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
If there were so many absentee ballots, why did they wait to count them (or release them) at 8:00am the day after the election?

Are these districts always counted last? Previous elections, same story?

32 posted on 11/20/2002 4:30:29 PM PST by listenhillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BohDaThone
Anecdotal evidence (and media reports) when I lived in Miami-Dade, where I lived in 2000, showed that black turnout was VERY high. I know that our local candidate for State's Attorney, Al Millian, was winning the election until these huge vote totals came in from the northern part of the county (heavily black) and the Beach (heavily Jewish and Gay).
33 posted on 11/20/2002 6:41:05 PM PST by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
The meltdown continues!!

Glad you posted both letters. I was just about to.

34 posted on 11/21/2002 1:21:18 AM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Dead Men Voting - Voter Fraud Wanders Off the Reservation ~ John Fund

Welcome to "Operation Big Vote," a non-Democratic Party effort ~ WSJ.

The Democrats stole two Senate seats--and still it wasn't enough ~ WSJ.

Landrieu Redux ~ WSJ. '97

Trouble in Paradise - Elections in Hawaii may not be a luau for Democrats ~ John Fund

Polling Isn't Perfect - Why polls so often get it wrong ~ John Fund

35 posted on 11/21/2002 2:18:49 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
I suppose Daschle and his Democrat "friends" think that calling everyone who doesn't agree with them "right-wing fundamentalists" will work instead of having a REAL MESSAGE. Well, I guess he had better talk to his "senator friend" MS. Hillary. It didn't work for her and it won't work for him either!
36 posted on 11/21/2002 2:25:07 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Perhaps unfortunately, anecdotal evidence doesn't fly in the face of record facts. It could well be true that minority precincts made the difference in a number of races. You can lose a precinct 990-10, and it really hurts, but if there are 2000 registered voters, it's still only a 50% turnout.

You can go to Florida state and county web sites, and see the precinct-by-precinct turnout figures. Florida also published the figures for turnout by race and party, and showed the results I indicated.

It doesn't mean that there were not a LOT of minority votes, and that they were unfavorable, just that the proportionate turnout was not unusual.

37 posted on 11/21/2002 7:15:26 AM PST by BohDaThone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; Cyber-Band; goldilucky
"Since when is 'indians' PC?"

Well, I'm one-sixteenth Injun--which, using the "one-drop rule" the RATS apply to so-called Black-Americans makes me a full-fledged Injun--and I don't have a problem being called Native-American and/or Indian.

PoliticalCorrectness Be Damned!!

FReegards...MUD

38 posted on 11/21/2002 7:26:21 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
I'm a quarter Indian and damn proud of it too.
39 posted on 11/21/2002 10:08:07 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
"damn proud of it"

You and me both...I'm mostly of German, French, and Welsh stock, but that little bit of Native-American just spices up the family tree a tad. My grandmother on my mama's side is coming to Richmond for the Thanksgiving holidays, and I'm gonna pump her fer more details that I'll be able to run with to do some geneological research.

FReegards...MUD

40 posted on 11/22/2002 5:24:29 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson