Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: #3Fan
Of course it's natural for the impression to vary from person to person. Clinton simply hugging on Chelsea makes people more leery than seeing Bush innocently plant one on the lips of his beautiful daughters. Even ignoring the politics, humans just get gut feelings as to sexual udertones in a hug or kiss -- or photograph.
91 posted on 11/20/2002 1:04:06 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: spycatcher
Of course it's natural for the impression to vary from person to person. Clinton simply hugging on Chelsea makes people more leery than seeing Bush innocently plant one on the lips of his beautiful daughters. Even ignoring the politics, humans just get gut feelings as to sexual udertones in a hug or kiss -- or photograph.

Not to overdo the point but I think the false implication of incest is over the line because it seems to me a violation of these young women to falsely imply something of this nature. You can say what you want though and have fun with it. To each his own, we all have different standards of political discourse and if just one person would've spoken against it I would've skipped it. I certianly don't want to be the most uptight person here. I simply wanted any lurkers to know that not all of us will go over that line, even with Clinton who's committed every other crime.

93 posted on 11/20/2002 1:33:16 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson