Replies

I see you're back. You must be a masochist.

I've never seen anyone as irredeemably serious and over the top as yourself. You're deluded if you think I care about what's in your head, so don't pretend to speak for me. The facts speak for themselves. You're obviously the type that never changes their mind when presented with facts anyhow, so no use even trying. I'm just playing with you like a cat plays with humorless trolls.

My reference to you being a leftist disruptor was tongue-in-cheek to any other reader but yourself. I wasn't talking to you in that post anyhow, I was replying to the mention of a "taboo" with the point that incest isn't even a taboo to some on the far left who, like yourself, call normal people "puritans." By the way, some of your responses are completely nonsensical and show you aren't even absorbing the post before you do your Ginsu replies. It's good for a laugh, but of course your fellow Quakers won't find it very funny. Get thee a clue and a sense of humor, or return to whence you came.

I see you're back. You must be a masochist. I've never seen anyone as irredeemably serious and over the top as yourself. You're deluded if you think I care about what's in your head, so don't pretend to speak for me.

Then why do you keep trying to explain your position to me?

The facts speak for themselves. You're obviously the type that never changes their mind when presented with facts anyhow, so no use even trying. I'm just playing with you like a cat plays with humorless trolls.

Yeah right. That stratement is a fake as that photo. The fact is that I see nothing wrong with the photo and to imply the abomination that you applied to it is not right and over the top in my opinion.

My reference to you being a leftist disruptor was tongue-in-cheek to any other reader but yourself.

Of course. You're such a kidder.

I wasn't talking to you in that post anyhow, I was replying to the mention of a "taboo" with the point that incest isn't even a taboo to some on the far left who, like yourself, call normal people "puritans."

I believe I have the right to respond to a post that has my handle in it.

By the way, some of your responses are completely nonsensical and show you aren't even absorbing the post before you do your Ginsu replies. It's good for a laugh, but of course your fellow Quakers won't find it very funny. Get thee a clue and a sense of humor, or return to whence you came.

Incest jokes about particular people aren't humor from whence I came.

You do #3 a disservice. Anyway, I am reminded after my search down memory lane of the 2000 election why I have such an antipathy to all things gore:

http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3a1a71cc4958.htm#46

". . .the block of ballots (something on the order of 3000) emanating from the Carrier Battle Group and Amphibious Ready Group that covered the withdrawal of USS Cole arrived in Florida Saturday morning. The ballots are apparently being held in block and have not been sent to the appropriate counties for counting. The reason? Guess what. The Democrats are challenging their validity on grounds that they got here too late. Let's disenfranchise Americans serving their country overseas in unfriendly places while simultaneously recounting votes in south Florida deciding what the voter intended to do, rather than what he or she did. . . ."

[NOTE: remember that 7 Americans were killed in the attack on the Cole.] can't you just see algore trying to decide "h'mmm, win the election or count the military votes -- oooh, that's a hard one!" What a . . .