Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madprof98
The Scouts most certainly have acted with honor;Mr. Lambert is not being punished , he simply does not adhere to the standards required for membership.

It's so simple even a liberal can understand,even if she chooses not to.

5 posted on 11/19/2002 2:30:31 PM PST by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hoosierham
Mr. Lambert is not being punished . . .

A vital point. Nor is he being denied a right.

If he had any honor, he would have walked away from the Boy Scouts graciously the moment he realized he could no longer subscribe to its fundamental principles.

This isn't about honor. This is about a joint gay activist/atheist effort to destroy the Boy Scouts of America.

13 posted on 11/19/2002 2:34:40 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hoosierham
"standards required for membership."

If this article has the true reason that the person was rejected, it was not for being a Boy Scout but for an Adult leader ship role. This guy was already getting too old to be a Boy Scout and should have moved up to a Explorer Post. He did not fit the criteria for Scout Leaders.

29 posted on 11/19/2002 2:48:24 PM PST by Deguello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson