Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TOM MANGOLD: Terror on the Tube
The Evening Standard ^ | November 19, 2002 | Tom Mangold

Posted on 11/19/2002 10:42:04 AM PST by MadIvan

As London comes to terms with the threat of a terror attack, the Prime Minister has counselled that we should be vigilant on the Tube, and the emergency services and hospitals have given reassurances that the aftermath of an attack could be handled. We know we are living with a new level of threat: the difficulty lies in calculating a response that is not hysterical, but would meet any terror onslaught that uses chemical and biological weapons.

There is no hard evidence that any attack on the Tube is likely, let alone imminent - but with the UK now identified by al Qaeda as a target, it is prudent to prepare for the worst. London Underground's first stop as it reviews safety procedures should be New York.

When terrorist attacks using weapons of mass destruction were first taken seriously as far back as the mid-Sixties, the US Army's Special Operations Branch from Fort Detrick (home of the military's biological warfare programmes) was asked to establish the vulnerability of New York's underground railways.

The army spent four days testing the effects of a harmless anthrax simulant both from inside the tunnels and from the streets outside the stations. The results were so horrific that most remain classified after almost half a century.

Soldiers posing as passengers dropped light bulbs filled with the fake anthrax onto the tracks and measured how the bacteria would travel through the draughty tunnels. The consequences proved that an entire city could be contaminated with small amounts of bacteria. Strong wind flows and absence of natural light (which kills bacteria) are the perfect environment for the survival and distribution of most kinds of lethal bacteria and viral agents.

A mere 10 grams of dried bacteria (anthrax or tular aemia - Saddam has quantities of both) would infect hundreds of thousands of passengers in a very short time. Those waiting on platforms or inside trains would inhale more than 10 infectious doses after just five minutes.

Because London's Tube system is deliberately designed not to be airtight, but rather to allow ventilation to and from the street, entrances to Tubes and ventilation outlets would allow the escape of airborne gases and germs. Bugs blown out of the Underground would soon infect the city.

David Kelly, one of Britain's top biological warfare experts, doubts whether there are any effective counter-measures in the event of an attack short of spraying every inch of London's Tube system and all the stations either with formaldehyde or newly developed antibacterial foams. This would be hugely expensive and time-consuming.

The British military do, in fact, have standby plans for such an attack, rehearsed in great secrecy. They div ide the living into three rather brutally named groups, "walkers, floppers and goners". In the chaos, little could be done for the last two groups. Dealing with panic in the streets and attacks on pharmacies and hospitals would soon require savage crowd-control methods. A more complete strategy for response was developed in the late 1990s in New York by Jerry Hauer, the man behind New York's Office of Emergency Management.

Hauer had sole responsibility for dealing with biochemical attacks on his city, and his planning is still in force there today - and widely consulted as a model for other cities.

A couple of years ago, representatives from the Met came to his 20th-floor headquarters in Wall Street to gather advice from him on dealing with a chemical/biological attack in a confined space.

Hauer's disaster scenarios were deemed by many to be scaremongering. They look less far-fetched these days. What he did see very clearly was that the secret of effective terror prevention is to have tested the worst options and prepared a planned and strategic, not just an emergency, response.

In this spirit, there is much that London can learn from New York's careful preparation for such an attack. Sensitive detectors could be placed in vulnerable locations and specifically throughout the London Tube system. London could imitate Hauer and train 4,000 police, fire and emergency units and 1,500 doctors and nurses in how to deal with biochemical attacks.

They should all, as first responders, be issued with special protective masks containing high efficiency particulate absorbing filters. If those on the front line of the emergency treatment fall ill, the battle is lost.

But the biggest problem by far would be just knowing that an attack has taken place. Suicide bombers can take a holiday on this one, as terrorists may do their deadly work and walk away before the outbreak even begins.

So, critically, doctors and nurses need careful training to recognise the difference between a common flu outbreak and the first symptoms of anthrax or even smallpox, which are similar.

Finally, the capital should consider spending some £1 million, as New York did, on a couple of mobile emergency trailers filled with containment vessels that can isolate, analyse and transport samples of suspected germs or chemicals. The vehicles also carry antidotes and medicines. They would be the capital's front-line tanks after a bacterial invasion.

We should also be talking to the pharmaceutical houses to acquire and stockpile millions of doses of antibiotics and antidotes (the Americans keep them in huge mobile refrigerated trucks at secret locations). None of this would halt all the terrible consequences of an attack, but it would certainly alleviate it.

When the Home Office held a major biological attack simulated scenario at the Greater Manchester police training school, the operation, codenamed "Firestorm", involved a terrorist attack using anthrax. The exercise apparently ended with a huge argument between the police and the local authorities on whether to evacuate 200,000 people from the city.

The official conclusions - perhaps wisely - remain a guarded secret. Now that the stakes are higher, we can't afford to take chances. Terror is best countered by being prepared to face the worst.

Tom Mangold is the author of Plague Wars, a book on biological warfare


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: gasattack; terrorism; tube
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
And I still ride the Tube nearly every day. Right, I'm getting a gas mask just in case.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 11/19/2002 10:42:04 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TopQuark; TexKat; Iowa Granny; vbmoneyspender; America's Resolve; BigWaveBetty; widgysoft; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 11/19/2002 10:42:29 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Right, I'm getting a gas mask just in case.

Won't you look rather funny? Suit, briefcase, gas mask?

3 posted on 11/19/2002 10:43:56 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Won't you look rather funny? Suit, briefcase, gas mask?

Well if I carry it, it's more likely I can come home to you, should the worst happen, darling. ;)

There was a security alert on the Tube yesterday evening; my first thought was of you, my second thought was, "Bugger, I should have gotten a mask".

Love, Ivan

4 posted on 11/19/2002 10:45:51 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; Happygal
One of these days, I'm going to click on one of these threads, and find nothing but you two, surrounded by bouquets of roses and poetry by Keats. ;)
5 posted on 11/19/2002 10:51:40 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Well not always Keats; often times I write my own. But then again I miss the mark more often than JK did.

The difference between an amateur and a professional. ;)

But the roses you have right. ;)

Regards, Ivan

6 posted on 11/19/2002 10:54:10 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I'm going to click on one of these threads, and find nothing but you two, surrounded by bouquets of roses and poetry by Keats. ;)

Uh-no! I don't go anywhere's without a barrell of Guinness! ;-) (I'm a romantic you see! *L*)

7 posted on 11/19/2002 10:54:49 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happygal; MadIvan
Sorry but this is even starting to make me nauseous.
8 posted on 11/19/2002 10:55:40 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Believe me right after Sept. 11th everyone in NYC was buying gas masks. I even order two expensive ones for my boss and his wife. He asked me if I wanted one and I told him no and here is why: The problem with them is when you buy them you have to be wearing them when the attack happens. How many people are going to walk around with a gas masks on. They are a waste of money unless you walk out of your house wearing one. By the time you put it on you will already be dead from the cyanide gas. Horrible thought but true. Looks like our British brothers and sisters are going to be bombarded with threats every 3 or 4 months just like we are. All you can do is be alert and pray nothing happens unless you convert to Islam and then you will be safe and sound </sarcasm>. That's the latest threat for NY and Washington. Wonder what is next?
9 posted on 11/19/2002 10:57:20 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
I'm sorry.
10 posted on 11/19/2002 10:59:56 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Sorry but this is even starting to make me nauseous.

Sugar overload? You're not diabetic, are you?

BTW, Ivan asked me to give this to you:

:^)

11 posted on 11/19/2002 11:02:15 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: general_re
My thanks, my friend, that's the best chuckle I've had all day. ;)

Regards, Ivan

12 posted on 11/19/2002 11:04:18 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; Happygal
You guys are cracking me up....:-)
13 posted on 11/19/2002 11:11:49 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dog
You guys are cracking me up....:-)

Well one does one's best to lighten the tone around here.

Regards, Ivan

14 posted on 11/19/2002 11:14:08 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: general_re; Dog; MadIvan
I thought it was the girls who were supposed to be the mushy ones.
15 posted on 11/19/2002 12:01:49 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
I thought it was the girls who were supposed to be the mushy ones.

Well if you want me to be a typical boyfriend I can give it a go:

Where's the television remote? Is Arsenal playing? Damn it, where's me lager? ENGERRLAND ENGERRLAND ENGERLLAND....

Love, Ivan

16 posted on 11/19/2002 12:14:23 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
And I still ride the Tube nearly every day. Right, I'm getting a gas mask just in case.

Good. Wear it in continued good health. Thhe stuff in this story scares the stuffing out of me and I'mm 6,000 miles from the Tube!

17 posted on 11/19/2002 2:21:16 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re; MadIvan; Happygal
One of these days, I'm going to click on one of these threads, and find nothing but you two, surrounded by bouquets of roses and poetry by Keats. ;)

That's why the lovely Rambette is not a member of FR. If she and I were on here at the same time, JimRob would have to start giving away insulin.

18 posted on 11/19/2002 2:25:10 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
That's why the lovely Rambette is not a member of FR. If she and I were on here at the same time, JimRob would have to start giving away insulin.

Thank goodness for that, I was beginning to think that romantics were an endangered species.

Regards, Ivan

19 posted on 11/19/2002 2:27:06 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Actually you would have a few seconds to actually get the mask on unless the toxic gas weapon is literally dumped at your feet the standard for the armed forces is 10 seconds. The fact that the folks in Washinton D.C. all have gasmasks & are building themselves a brand new $286 million dollar state of the engineering art bunker literaly attached to the back wall of the Capitol buildings basement. The sad part is that 99%of what is being done is to protect the government class .Note to all freepers if you are going to buy a gasmask get one from the manufacturer or a safety equiptment supplier not the army surplus store. You will get new equiptment not something that has been sitting on a warehouse shelf for 10 to 40 years.
20 posted on 11/19/2002 5:02:14 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson