Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homeland Security Vote Coming Up on CSPAN
CSPAN | 11/19/02 | freedom1st

Posted on 11/19/2002 7:17:38 AM PST by freedom1st

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 701-720 next last
To: Wphile
Did McCain vote???
101 posted on 11/19/2002 8:14:12 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Neets
This vote kills the Daschle/Lieberman amendment. Now passage of the bill is a done deal.

(Lordy loo...I often misunderstand these senate votes...but someone will correct me if I'm wrong.)

102 posted on 11/19/2002 8:14:21 AM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

Yep she was released to vote no when it was evident it was going down to defeat. She'll try to campaign on it during the next couple of weeks....

103 posted on 11/19/2002 8:14:23 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
I'm cubicle bound. Don't know.
104 posted on 11/19/2002 8:14:26 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
See what that 66% approval rating will get you.....:-)
105 posted on 11/19/2002 8:14:55 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Did Allard and Campbell of Colorado vote the RIGHT way?
106 posted on 11/19/2002 8:15:08 AM PST by Two Thirds Vote Aye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Well, there will be tort reform in the next congress. I'm sure of it. W complained about trial lawyers throughout this entire campaign.
107 posted on 11/19/2002 8:15:09 AM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
For the moment, I'll take her vote. Then we'll fight her in LA. Nelson of Nebraska voted NO. Daschle is dead meat.
108 posted on 11/19/2002 8:15:19 AM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: mwl1; All
Okay, enlighten me....I thought this was a bad bill because of all the pork spending added at the last minute, that had absolutely nothing to do with security.....so, I thought this would be something not good to pass.....
109 posted on 11/19/2002 8:15:20 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Nelson ...Neb.......NO!!!!
110 posted on 11/19/2002 8:15:27 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Two Thirds Vote Aye
Nelson - NB - NO
111 posted on 11/19/2002 8:15:31 AM PST by Jambe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: montag813
I think this was a means of getting a start on tort reform early. I expect it will be handled as you wish this next year. I predict this is gonna be a really bad year for the Trial Lawyers, NEA and ACLU/People for the American Way!
112 posted on 11/19/2002 8:15:51 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: deport
This vote is an appropriate and symbolic repudiation of Daschle's 16-month stewardship of the Senate. It was utterly broken under his failed leadership. The senators looked him in the eye and said NO.
113 posted on 11/19/2002 8:16:17 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
52-47......Daschle LOSES!!!!!!!!
114 posted on 11/19/2002 8:16:20 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I don't think he has, yet. But he is on record as supporting the Daschle amendment.
115 posted on 11/19/2002 8:16:43 AM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
I just got online. What are they voting on right now?
116 posted on 11/19/2002 8:17:06 AM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: deport
And Terrell will say "If you'd have voted in favor of it before November 5th, we'd already be working on hiring people for this Department. Instead we had to wait weeks and weeks-- risking American lives."
117 posted on 11/19/2002 8:17:12 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
47 - 52 quite a stinging defeat for Daschle, I'd say.
118 posted on 11/19/2002 8:17:15 AM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
I think stomping Daschel's face into the mud trumps minor details.
119 posted on 11/19/2002 8:17:25 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
As I understand the amendments, they were not pork per se, but rather things like protection of companies that produce vaccines from excessive litigation, research facility requirements, etc. Perhaps someone else can illuminate this subject.

I think the "pork" phrase was one used by the media to try and fool people.

120 posted on 11/19/2002 8:17:41 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 701-720 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson