Posted on 11/19/2002 6:57:56 AM PST by Carbonsteel
United States District Court Judge James M. Simmonds on Sunday found Coy T. Brown guilty of assaulting Mexican immigrant Juan Mauricio Gonzalez with a fire arm and sentenced him to five years in prison, Notimex reported.
After a two-year investigation spearheaded by the Foreign Relations Secretariat, Brown was found guilty of firing a pistol on April 10, 2000, at Gonzalez, a native of Tasquillo, Hidalgo.
In addition to his prison sentence, Brown, a Texas rancher, was denied bail and assessed a 10,000-dollar fine, the SRE said.
The SRE applauded the judge's decision and said it would intensify its efforts to fight for Mexican immigrant rights abroad.
Actually, the leftists are the ones doing the labelling here - I bought into some of the allegations against Glenn Spencer, but after some research I don't think he's racist - but a favored method of the left is to brand anyone they disagree with a racist in an attempt to stifle debate.
What ist the judge supposed to do here? Slap the guy on the wrist for shooting someone in the back? I support the notion of private citizens stopping illegals on private land until the INS comes. But you just can't shoot a guy who isn't threatening you - whether he's an illegal alien or a citizen.
The sentence should have been less. The same for the crime if committed in Mexico. This decision is designed, custom-made, to intimidate all other ranchers. So the net effect is to encourage more Mexican border jumping, property desecration and crime. The Mexican counsel down there is happy today.
Like I said, the judge can care less. He's got a FedGubberMint job with all the bennies while other Americans contend with a lousy economy and an immigration invasion.
The guy was facing up to twenty years, so the judge didn't throw the book at him. Shooting someone in the back is a pretty serious crime, no matter who they are. I don't think this will have a chilling effect at all for anyone who tries to patrol private land in a lawful manner.
Generally, when someone is shot in the back, they are not coming towards you. My guess would be (and it's just a guess) is that the illegal who was shot was trying to run away from Brown and Brown shot him, and then made up a story to try and cover up what had happened.
Wrong and cowardly but the Mexican invasion is 200 times worse and 200 times more cowardly. And weren't these Mexicans breaking into a cabin? Now they get to sue this rancher who was sick and tired of this criminal invasion and flipped
I don't think this will have a chilling effect at all for anyone who tries to patrol private land in a lawful manner.
Common sense says it will.
If US troops are put on the border and authorized to use deadly force against drug smugglers this will be fine by me. I hope the border gets mined too. Big "Peligroso" signs can be put up and let the chips fall where they may.
You deserve respect your objectivity, DB.
From the article I posted in reply #10:
Brown said he then marched the two men back to the caliche road and down to a neighbor’s ranch, where he reported the break-in. He then left before authorities arrived.
But Letsinger said that when he took Brown back to the cabin later that night he could find no sign of a break-in, nor could he find any human footprints over a stretch of soft earth that Brown said he and the Mexican men had traversed.
“He said it must have been the weather,” Letsinger said of Brown’s explanation for the absent footprints. But Letsinger said other footprints and tire tracks made that day had not been erased.
In summing up the case, Letsinger testified, “I can find no reason why Coy Brown shot at either one of those men.
I would guess that the illegal tried to run and Brown shot him.
It's worse than just bad, it's downright tragic. Our law enforcement agents down there are in danger, the American citizens who live close to the border are in danger, and the people who are illegally crossing the border are in danger. And it's all because the federal government is willfully derelict in its duty.
Actually, here in Florida, you are perfectly within your rights to shoot someone in the back in some cases. A couple of examples given in a recent CCW class I took were an armed burglar you encounter in your home, and a would-be kidnapper running away from you, but going for your kid. Of course, these scenarios don't have anything in common with the shooting on the border, but a shot in the back is sometimes called for and legally justified.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
They need to do something. They basically need to build a high wall, create a 300 yard cleared area on both sides of it and patrol it with dogs, and have random police checks a couple of miles down every road from urban areas. And they need to deal honestly with the labor issues. If we need a certain level of Mexican immigrant labor, then come up with a way for the people in question to be here legally, and it will be better for them and better for citizens. And, once they institute such a program, the feds need to crack down HARD on anyone still hiring illegal labor. Get rid of the demand, and the supply will dwindle.
And finally, change the law saying that anyone born in the U.S. is automatically a citizen - that should only apply to children of folks here legally with a green card who are planning to become citizens themselves. And eliminate most welfare and health benefits for illegals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.