Sorry, but your writing style towards people is very condescending. It was condescending from the beginning and has remained so. I simply called you on it, and it continues to show evertime you write. You are the Algore of online discourse.
None of the ratings you cited deny the use of nonblinded studies in science. Apparently they qualify under the guidelines and they don't consider them worthless. Wiggle all you want, but they ARE presented in medical journals and databases. You again ignore the facts and set up straw man arguments.
If you feel the need for the last word, as I suspect you do. Feel free to respond. As far as I'm concerned this debate is over as you continue to ignore facts in order to pointlessly argue. Cheers.
Lemme make it easy for you (I'll type slowly so you can get it): what you describe as a "study" is considered the lowest form of data--equal to an anecdotal report (because, after all, that's what it is). This is not science, but storytelling, and if you cannot tell the difference, it is you who are cognitvely impaired.
Transmission over...you may now have the last word.