Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Formerly Brainwashed Democrat
Swartzcoff (sic) wanted to take the war to Bagdad and finish off Saddam.

He is also strongly against a new war on Iraq.

40 posted on 11/18/2002 8:59:53 AM PST by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Zviadist
Gen. Swartzcoff (would someone please give me correct spelling of his name?) is opposed to a new war on Iraq, because our troop strength is way down, thanks to Billy-Boy Clinton.

But the fact remains, it was Colin Powell that talked Pres. Bush 41 to NOT take the war to Baghdad and finish off Saddam.

Swartzcoff was on a roll and ready to go to Baghdad.
He was as right on the money about Saddam, as Patton was about Stalin.

Powell, then and now, is more an obstacle than he is an assett.

He is a globalist, and does not have nearly the cahones, or the interests of the US that some think he has.
49 posted on 11/18/2002 9:24:49 AM PST by FBD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson