Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: archy
You didn't understand my point either. The 20,000 will likely be but the tip of the iceburg, the *first wave*.

I highly doubt that. The most likely result of 20,000 people moving into the state is those 20,000 people moving back out of the state in a few years.

The possibility of 40,000 *contrarian votes* won't be much of a problem if there are 400,000 of those new chum voters overwhelming them by the end of the decade

Like I said, the only state you could take over with that many votes is Wyoming--and there are very good reasons for Wyoming having as low a population as it does, most of which relate to the free market. Increasing the population of Wyoming by 400,000 or so would require a program of public largesse--and lots of it--in order to achieve the goal.

if America still has anything resembling free or honest elections by then.

Well, it looks like you have a handy excuse for failure already primed up: "the elections were stolen by the EE-VIL Republicans and Democrats."

406 posted on 11/20/2002 12:49:16 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
Well, it looks like you have a handy excuse for failure already primed up

It's what passes for Libertarian foresight.

409 posted on 11/20/2002 1:00:02 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson