Southern Idaho (i.e., most of the frickin' state, thankyewverymuch) most assuredly has a water problem, unless you use non-Libertarian methods (public water projects) to impound water.
As for Northern Idaho, kindly refer to my other remarks--namely, that thinly populated places are usually thinly populated for good reason. Northern Idaho would have a difficult time accomodating another 20,000 residents.
And you'd need closer to 500,000 than 20,000 bodies, anyway.
"...Southern Idaho (i.e., most of the frickin' state, thankyewverymuch) most assuredly has a water problem, unless you use non-Libertarian methods (public water projects) to impound water..."
I wouldn't have a have a problem with State funded public water projects, Poohbah.