Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Columnist Broder Sees Potential Party Switches by Senators McCain and Chaffee
The Washington Post | 11-18-02 | Theodore R.

Posted on 11/18/2002 5:55:44 AM PST by Theodore R.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Theodore R.
It worked out so well for Jeffords, I am sure everyone will be doing it now. /sarcasm
41 posted on 11/18/2002 7:36:29 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Chaffee we knew about. At least he had the cajones to threaten to switch. That McTraitor might finaaly come out of the closet...really, it depends on what's in it for him, politically. With the current mood of the country, party switches = even more of a political death sentence now than in the past.

No one trusts a traitor.

Still, we need to win Louisiana. Conservatives throughout the country have to get involved.

42 posted on 11/18/2002 7:37:24 AM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Dude, I know democRat McCainiacs who are just lusting for a McCain\Boxer ticket in 2K4...
43 posted on 11/18/2002 7:38:44 AM PST by Axenolith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Chafee doesn't have a chairmanship to lose. But McCain does, of the juicy Commerce Committee. Anybody who heard McCain on Election Night will not believe McCain will switch.
44 posted on 11/18/2002 7:43:04 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bob_esb
I'm an independent...but there is no way on Earth I will ever vote for McStain.
45 posted on 11/18/2002 7:48:35 AM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
It is NOT going to happen. Check this out from Drudge.

Rebel McCain back in Commerce saddle

'Straight shooter' has several aims

By Anne C. Mulkern Denver Post Washington Bureau

Friday, November 15, 2002 - WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. John McCain is rushing to a celebratory luncheon days after Republicans regained control of Congress when a throng of reporters surges forward.

The Arizona lawmaker and former presidential hopeful proffers a look of faux surprise as the questions come rapid fire: “Will you eliminate Amtrak subsidies?” “Will you let airports miss the deadline for luggage screening?” “What telephone regulations do you want to change?”

McCain smiles and pivots toward the group, holding court for a few minutes. Nov. 5’s election results put him back in charge of a key Senate committee that oversees issues affecting telephone companies, cable television, airlines, trains, tourism and a host of other industries. Decisions the committee makes potentially affect, among others, Denver-based Qwest Communications International, Level 3 Communications, United Airlines and Lockheed Martin.

It’s clear McCain’s eager to be back in charge, after 18 months as a minority voice. What’s not yet clear is what his leadership on the Senate Commerce Committee will mean for businesses and consumers. An avowed free-market advocate, McCain is likely to push for further deregulation of telecommunications and other governed industries. But he also fights to protect consumers and competition, even when that bumps up against free-market philosophies.

“If you went through the list of 100 senators, there would be no one more unpredictable than John McCain,” said Larry Sabato, head of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. “He’s a populist. He’s going to pick issues that have a lot of popular appeal.”

McCain, 66, will undoubtedly be more business friendly than his predecessor, South Carolina Democrat Fritz Hollings, 80, a self-described “born-again regulator.” But McCain, who’s referred to as “maverick John McCain” so often one might think it’s his given name, is unlikely to be a clear-cut corporate advocate.

The Republican is known to butt heads with his party on significant issues. Each year, he stands in the Senate chambers and castigates spending on local community pet projects he calls “pork barrel” politics. He’s one of two lawmakers who authored campaign finance reform, ending a type of contribution business interests used heavily, mainly to support Republicans. He’s also headed investigations into corporate corruption.

That iconoclastic approach has generated some behind-the-scenes ire among fellow politicians.

“John McCain got away with being the ‘Straight Talk Express,’” outgoing U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, said last week, referring to the nickname of McCain’s failed 2000 presidential bid. “If that was straight talk, John Wayne should be rolling in his grave. We are so hungry for anything we can believe might be straight talk that we even bought in to John McCain.”

That public criticism of McCain is something hard to find these days. With McCain re-ascending to a position of some power, most are hesitant to criticize and quick to praise, offering the popular: “We look forward to working with Senator McCain as chairman of the committee.”

McCain had been chairman of Senate Commerce from 1997 until May 2001, when Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont switched allegiance from the Republican Party, swinging power to the Democrats. Commerce Committee chairmanship then flipped to Hollings, who authored the 1996 telecommunications act and has fought to protect telephone industry regulations. Hollings also opposed the Federal Communications Commission’s new push to eliminate rules barring media companies from merging. And he’s fought to protect Amtrak from folding.

McCain is likely to revisit all those issues and more, with a far more deregulatory bent. He said he has not been happy with the direction of the committee over the 18 months.

“I just have a little different philosophy about government,” McCain said, comparing his politics to Hollings’. “I think one of our differences would have been on regulation.”

McCain said he’s developing a list of new priorities for the committee but is not ready to make it public.

“A lot of us didn’t anticipate that I would be the chairman quite this soon,” he said, somewhat wryly.

Those familiar with McCain say he’s likely to look at government subsidies for Amtrak, rules governing mergers by media companies, funding mechanisms for the Federal Aviation Administration and cable monopolies, which he has criticized. He’s also pushed for free time for political commercials, to make campaigns less dependent of political contributions.

“I think you’re going to see an activist John McCain,” said Mark Buse, who worked for McCain for 18 years and now works as a private industry lobbyist on telecommunications and aviation issues. “Senator McCain, I believe, will use the committee’s resources to launch some more thorough investigations on issues of the day.”

One area he’s sure to target, however, is the set of regulations governing phone companies such as Qwest.

“The whole (1996) Telecommunications Act was a disaster. Everybody realizes it,” McCain said in an interview last week. “We need to review that.”

Under that law, local phone companies that want to sell long-distance must open their local monopolies to competitors. Qwest and others say that has quelled their interest in building infrastructure to expand the availability of high-speed Internet service because they’d have to make that infrastructure available to competitors. McCain, in legislation earlier this year, proposed exempting residential broadband service from that portion of the law, to encourage investment in expansion.

“I think Senator McCain put that (legislation) down as sort of a marker, and a discussion piece,” said Robert McDowell, vice president of the Competitive Telecommunications Association, a trade group for smaller companies that compete with Qwest and other regional phone companies.

Phone companies are among the biggest contributors to McCain’s re-election efforts, with Qwest and its predecessor US West giving the most of any business over the past five years. But that won’t guarantee phone companies favorable policy. McCain is known to chew up and spit out the hand that feeds him. While previously chairman of the Commerce Committee, he helped scuttle the attempted merger of United Airlines and US Airways because he feared it would trigger more consolidation in the airline industry.

“He’s going to see to it that the consumer wins. To the extent big business is at cross purposes (to that), they don’t get what they want,” said John Timmons, who worked for McCain for 10 years and now lobbies for private industry, including the Competitive Telecommunications Association.

McCain’s chairmanship of the Commerce Committee is likely to influence what happens at the FCC, which next year begins an in-depth review of phone company regulations. McCain shepherded FCC Chairman Michael Powell’s ascension and is likely to work closely with Powell on regulatory issues. Powell is also an avowed deregulator.

“I think he’ll come up with a rather aggressive agenda working with Mike Powell and the FCC that we’ll see next year,” Buse said.

Hollings, in contrast, used the Commerce chairmanship, and his position on the Appropriations Committee, to try to block FCC attempts to lessen telecommunications regulation.

“The FCC probably will feel like it doesn’t have someone breathing down its neck,” said David Butler, spokesman for Consumers Union, which is concerned that deregulation of phones could hurt consumers. “Given Senator McCain’s relationship with the FCC and its chairman, it’s unlikely he’ll be as tough as Senator Hollings.”

Hollings declined to comment when asked last week what he would do to preserve the Telecommunications Act.

46 posted on 11/18/2002 7:51:39 AM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware
"Straight shooter"

Cut me a break. The guy is a rabidly anti-Second Amendment RINO. Interestin' political ploy to attach the word "shooter" to a man who wants to take away all of our guns.

"If you went through the list of 100 senators, there would be no one more unpredictable than John McCain," said Larry Sabato, head of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. "He’s a populist. He’s going to pick issues that have a lot of popular appeal."

Sure. As if running your career strictly by the polls and having teams of aides constantly holding a finger to the political wind is't predictable. Sabato's dreaming. Guess he missed the Clinton years.

47 posted on 11/18/2002 8:11:26 AM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I don't think that McCain and Chaffee will jump ship after the GOP's strong victory. These guys are politicians, and they're very conscious of which way the wind's blowing.

Chaffee is a possibility, though I don't think so now. But McCain would be a bald-faced liar if he switched. I just don't think he will.

But I agree with everybody that the GOP must win LA.

I'm praying for a Terrell victory.
48 posted on 11/18/2002 9:27:12 AM PST by No dems 2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
Why? The Democrats might very well nominate someone like McCain in 2008 (assuming Bush is re-elected in 2004). They could use him to appeal to centrist and independent voters. The Left wing of the party would scream, but they would quiet down when it was explained to them that accepting McCain is their only way to get back into power further down the line.

I think that by 2008, there would be garbage truck load of Democrats wanting to run for president who would be unwilling to get out of the way for an interloper. Especially one who would potentially hog the scene until 2016.

49 posted on 11/18/2002 3:36:26 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: OldFriend
McCain and Gore are seemingly unable to move beyond the 2000 elections. Losers together!
Did McCain say he was going to switch??? or did he threaten to switch?? sounds like Broder speculating to me and not anything near the truth.
51 posted on 11/18/2002 7:18:49 PM PST by ottersnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
McCain and Gore are seemingly unable to move beyond the 2000 elections. Losers together!
Did McCain say he was going to switch??? or did he threaten to switch?? sounds like Broder speculating to me and not something that is likely to happen. I don't think this would further McCains agenda.
52 posted on 11/18/2002 7:19:30 PM PST by ottersnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Wishful thinking by a typical Inside the Beltway Liberal. There's no way in hell that McCain would switch like that, it would be dishonorable and treacherous and McCain, whatever you may think of him, is neither of these. He has way too much fun right where he is, sticking his thumb in the President's eye as a Republican.
53 posted on 11/18/2002 9:14:41 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Whether intentional or not, the possibility makes the Landrieu run-off more consequential.
54 posted on 11/18/2002 9:15:10 PM PST by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Wishful thinking from Broder.
55 posted on 11/18/2002 9:33:14 PM PST by Reagan is King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Broder woke up with wood after he dreamed this one up.
56 posted on 11/18/2002 9:43:44 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Doubt it will happen, but I really think that a lot of the momentum from the last election can be traced back directly to how the Dems run their party and (try to) run the country. I don't think there would be a single issue that would fire up the Republicans more than if Daschle orchestrated something like what Broder has dreamed up.

The Dems haven't been elected into the majority for a decade and judging by their party's standard bearers it doesn't seem to likely to happen in the next decade either.

57 posted on 11/18/2002 10:16:33 PM PST by SHKMAN1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SHKMAN1212
doesn't seem too likely to happen... sorry, it has been a long night waiting for those meteors...
58 posted on 11/18/2002 10:18:08 PM PST by SHKMAN1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.; Reagan is King; dead; pgkdan; ottersnot; goldstategop; Stirner; beckett
McCain will leave the GOP before 2004 so he can run for President as an independent against Bush; all he needs is an excuse. At 64, McCain knows it's now or never. So far, the evidence that he'll run in '04 is that he has hired one of Christopher Dodd's liberal staffers and ex-Republican Marshall Wittmann, co-sponsored virtually every major Democratic bill over the last two years, and invited Daschle and Kerry to his ranch. McCain has never forgiven Bush for denying him the nomination in '00 and insulting his "honor," and he is determined to make Bush pay for it.



59 posted on 11/18/2002 10:28:41 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thank you! I knew there was a reason.
60 posted on 11/18/2002 10:31:30 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson