To: HiTech RedNeck
If the stuff DOES cause child autism, $250K is not going to pay for the lifelong maintenance, let alone any pain-and-suffering claims. The families will be bankrupted and thrown on welfare.True. I can only wonder what kind of compensation the lawyers and victims are seeking. 10 or 20 million per autistic child? And does the substance actually cause autism?
16 posted on
11/18/2002 4:14:37 AM PST by
dennisw
To: dennisw
True. I can only wonder what kind of compensation the lawyers and victims are seeking. 10 or 20 million per autistic child? And does the substance actually cause autism? The sad thing is that there has never been a properly done study that showed any kind of relationship of MMR to autism.
22 posted on
11/18/2002 4:25:48 AM PST by
TomB
To: dennisw
And does the substance actually cause autism? It's amazing that people want to rush to sue someone when nobody knows what causes autism. How can a drug company be held responsible for autism when the cause of autism is not known?
52 posted on
11/18/2002 5:38:11 AM PST by
alnick
To: dennisw
1. Vaccines don't cause autism.
2. Trial attorneys are saying it causes autism in order to create more litigation.
3. Pass the Homeland Security Bill in the US Senate.
If Trent Lott can't get this bill passed, we should pass on Trent Lott as Senate Majority Leader.
MOVE IT OR LOSE IT Mr Lott!
SENATOR FRIST FOR SENATE MAJORITY LEADER!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson