Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jd777
No, I'm just trying to say that it is difficult to know what a president's legacy will be until some years have passed. History (and the American people) would probably forgive another terrorist attack on Bush's watch if it could NOT be blamed on his failure to control our borders.

I don't think anyone seriously blamed Clinton for "allowing" the Oklahoma city bombing, and history will look upon it as something that simply happened co-incident to his presidency.

9/11 is different. He spent years de-funding and ignoring the CIA and military, and he turned down several opportunities to capture Bin Laden. In short, he probably could have prevented the attacks of 9/11, but he did not.
21 posted on 11/17/2002 5:42:25 PM PST by e_engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: e_engineer
I don't think anyone seriously blamed Clinton for "allowing" the Oklahoma city bombing, and history will look upon it as something that simply happened co-incident to his presidency.

Unless of course, it is proven that ME's were involved in the OKC bombing, as many reports seem to indicate.

31 posted on 11/18/2002 6:07:34 AM PST by Clovis_Skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson