[Jim Noble]

>>Yes, and they have the 'right to choose' to not spread their legs and engage in sexual intercourse, prior to murder<<

Is it the sex that bothers you, or the killing?

I think there are converts to be won on the "we support your right to choose not to be pregnant, as long as it doesn't require murder" front.

I don't think there are many converts on the "you have no right to have sex" front.

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

You misunderstood my post completely. I have no problem with the sex. I do though have a problem with LACK OF RESPONSIBILITY of the CHOICE of not getting pregnant.

It is common sense that abstinence (if 'one' does not want to get pregnant) is 100%.

I do NOT agree with National Organization for Women's cure all answer is carte blanche= birth control enforcement. As all studies prevail to the dangers of all of the birth control devices. (Read the pamphlet as thick as a small novel on all of the risks of THE PILL) The LEFT don't want to discuss the huge increase in death i e.... Breast Cancer, heart problems etc.... linked to birth control pills, shots and implants.

The one thing the politically LEFT lack is responsibility muchless promoting it. I DO NOT agree with the "IF IT FEELS GOOD, DO IT" irresponsible fad, no matter how long it has been around in different forms of our culture.

[stylin_geek]

I think you are missing the point, in that one of the potential consequences of having sex is pregnancy, however, with the advent of "abortion rights" this removes taking any responsibility for ones actions.