Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sal
In the event of a candidate's death, dems would be circumspect to avoid any campaigning at any eulogy. In fact, it might be better to have the death/accident of the child of the nominee to elicit maximum sympathy and allow for legitimate withdraw without the taint of wothdrawl for a potential loss. The sympathy would be there.

Announcing Condi as VP 2004 would go far to guard against this event.

27 posted on 11/17/2002 8:13:19 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt_Schultze
OMG, Sgt. A stroke of genius, and you're right that they would have learned not to go over the top, but rather let the sympathy develop naturally.

But I think you're still thinking with too much decency. I don't even want to type it straight out, but consider. If the candidate herself lost a child, say right before her first debate (or at any time it started to get too dicey), it would be too cold and cruel to expect her to debate, campaign, etc.

Anyway, we all know her already, right? Surrogates could appear in her place shamelessly promoting her as the hard fighting champion of the little people...

34 posted on 11/17/2002 8:37:31 AM PST by Sal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson