[omegatoo]

Terrell's "attack ads" consisted of explaining that Mary voted to raise taxes (she did) and that she voted for taxpayer funded abortions (she did). Terrell also promised to vote against increasing taxes, against abortion, and with President Bush. Since when is accurately stating your opponent's actions a "negative attack ad"? Nobody has yet said they weren't true, just that they were "negative". And since when is explaining how you will perform if elected "no platform"?
O2

[newslady]

Since when is accurately stating your opponent's actions a "negative attack ad"? Nobody has yet said they weren't true, just that they were "negative".

Well said, omegatoo. There was absolutely nothing in the ads that wasn't true--I guess the truth hurts!