Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Redcloak
Call me crazy, but I had a real problem with this article from the first sentence. What the heck does "radiation-proof" mean??

Traditional protective clothing only protects against alpha radiation.

This sentence is factually wrong. Normal everyday clothing can shield out beta radiation. It's safe to put a beta radiation source in your pants pocket.

The problem that I have with this article is that it doesn't offer any kind of comparison of the shielding ability of this material versus lead, concrete, or steel. (That is, 1 inch of this new material has the equivalent shielding ability of ? inches of lead.)

This article has the same look and feel of the articles that surface on FR from time to time talking about motors that are 500% efficient, new hydrogen powered engines that can propel your car 5000 miles on a gallon of fuel, and therapy magnets that can cure cancer.

34 posted on 11/16/2002 8:57:29 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
Mars then. Right. Off we go...
35 posted on 11/16/2002 9:17:54 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; MaeWest
"It's safe to put a beta radiation source in your pants pocket."


Is that a beta radiation source in your pocket,
or are you just happy to see me?
37 posted on 11/17/2002 4:09:55 AM PST by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson