Most people make it a practice to look for bias from the author of any posted article... Blatant bias by an author usually leads them to skew their "facts". But since this lawsuit lady happens to agree with you, her bias is "irrelevant" to you.
Then the majority of posters on FR must where tin hats.
The majority of posters on FR don't refer to websites which use the word "sheeple" as scientific evidence. But I suppose it's the best scientific evidence that you have, so I guess you had to use it.
You obviously have a hard time addressing any of the voluminous material that I've posted in relation to Thimerasol, so you pick on this woman and her kid. Yep, you really argue the facts here don't you...
The majority of posters on FR don't refer to websites which use the word "sheeple" as scientific evidence
You are ALSO ignoring all of the esteemed researchers and doctors that have spoken out against fluoride. Or did you even read those series of posts?