Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is a great tax proposed by Blomberg. It will take all those spineless moderate Republicans in Fairfield County and radicalize them.

I expect to see a lot of new CT Freepers soon!
1 posted on 11/16/2002 4:17:42 AM PST by cgbg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cgbg
Nah, most of us Fairfield County Freepers have long since stopped commuting to New Tax City.
2 posted on 11/16/2002 4:57:02 AM PST by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
Blomberg was a registered RAT, up till a year ago, when he switched so as to run on the uncrowded GOP side.
3 posted on 11/16/2002 5:11:31 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
The only thing not taxed nowadays is taking a healthy dump.
4 posted on 11/16/2002 5:29:22 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
"It's a classic example of taxation without representation,"

I hope they remember this principal with their multi-state internet tax, too.

6 posted on 11/16/2002 6:19:33 AM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
I fled from that socialist hellhole 10 years ago because the city government is run by corrupt politicians, union bosses, and the mafia.

A regular citizen doesn't have a chance in hell when both Rat and RINO politicians would rather tax them to death before giving up a single union job.

Notice that Blomberg wants to institute a new income tax on 800,000 commuters, cut services, and up property taxes 25% on home and business owners, but has not proposed the layoff of a single city worker.

If you aren't rich or don't work for the city, there is no sane reason to live there.

Bloomberg is a demented freak, like a lot of billionaires are.

Ted Turner and Tom Golisano come to mind.

7 posted on 11/16/2002 6:49:08 AM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
New York City is going to collapse on itself. The more it taxes, the less revenue will be attracted to it. So long. I won't miss you that much.
8 posted on 11/16/2002 7:37:59 AM PST by Glenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
There is a simple fact of economic theory that should be easy to understand.
You get more of what you subsidize, and less of what you tax

That applies to everything from farm subsidies to grants to the homeless.

You want more hobos in your town? Subsidize them like San Francisco does.

You want less commuters in your town? Tax them like Bloomberg intends.

9 posted on 11/16/2002 8:54:31 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
From the article:

the plan, which would cost a person making $100,000 close to $2,700 in taxes.

Hey, that's only an additional $225 a month, or $52 a week, or approximately $10 a day in taxes. </sarcasm>

10 posted on 11/16/2002 10:09:07 AM PST by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
How do New York City income taxes work?

In Ohio, if both the living and working locations have income taxes, the working location takes priority. For example, I live in a city with 1.75% income tax and work in a city with a 1.5% tax. That means I pay 1.5% to where I work and the remaining .25% to where I live.

Does the city of residence have first cut in New York?

14 posted on 11/16/2002 7:21:05 PM PST by KarlInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson