[Kerberos]

""Pro-lifers are asking themselves why they bothered when the GOP appears intent on sticking them with a gratuitous anti-life law that would expose peaceful anti-abortion protestors to financial ruin," Connor continued. "

Perhaps the Pro-Life group needs to form their own political party to promote their agenda.

[laconic]

The bill was defeated BECAUSE IT CONTAINED THE ABORTION PROVISION -- read this morning's Wall Street Journal; what is this man screaming about?

[jwalsh07]

Perhaps the Pro-Life group needs to form their own political party to promote their agenda.

Perhaps you should be made aware of the number of pro life Republicans.

[SwordofTruth]

Perhaps the Pro-Life group needs to form their own political party to promote their agenda.

They have, it's called the Republicans.

[Mannaggia l'America]

Perhaps the Pro-Life group needs to form their own political party to promote their agenda.

The DemocRats would just looove that to happen.

Maybe they can call the party "Libertarians II".

[Eagle Eye]

Then the GOPers would accuse them of electing Democrats.

EVERY vote belongs to the GOP. Then the GOP can crap on them. And then the GOP can dare them to leave, but then rail on them for not voting...

The GOP has a habit of expecting loyalty but not returning it.

[Ferndina]

Perhaps it would be beneficial if you understood that pro life is a supposed plank in the Republican platform. Perhaps pro abortion Republicans should think about forming their own party.