Posted on 11/14/2002 3:32:44 PM PST by 1bigdictator
Of course, Watts are a measure of power, which is energy per unit time, so a 1.2 GW device isn't necessarily out of line with a 12 GW eruption. The eruption operates for a much longer period.
Ahem. Far be it from me to step on your area of expertise, but isn't a synchronous orbit when the orbital period of a satellite matches the rotational period of the body being orbited? Isn't this, instead, an example of phase-locking, since the rotational period of Io matches the rotational period of Jupiter? After all, you can have a synchronous orbit where the satellite doesn't always display the same face to the orbited body, right?
Signed,
Bewildered in Buffalo
:^)
Better.
The atmosphere is broken up optically by thermal-induced flow into cells about a yard or less in diameter, give or take. A telescope looking through one cell could be focused sharply, but you can see if a telescope mirror is 2 yards across, it will look through 4 such cells, each with different overall focal length. A solid mirror could not focus for all cells simultaneously, but one with adaptive optics could, to a degree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.