Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Titanic volcanic eruption seen on Io [Photos r too cool for school]
The new scientist ^ | 11/14/02

Posted on 11/14/2002 3:32:44 PM PST by 1bigdictator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: aruanan
How many gigawatts did it take for the flux capacitor to power the DeLorean back to the future? Was it 1.2 gigawatts?

Of course, Watts are a measure of power, which is energy per unit time, so a 1.2 GW device isn't necessarily out of line with a 12 GW eruption. The eruption operates for a much longer period.

61 posted on 11/15/2002 4:39:21 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Which means that one side of the moon is facing Jupiter. This type of orbit is called a synchronous orbit.

Ahem. Far be it from me to step on your area of expertise, but isn't a synchronous orbit when the orbital period of a satellite matches the rotational period of the body being orbited? Isn't this, instead, an example of phase-locking, since the rotational period of Io matches the rotational period of Jupiter? After all, you can have a synchronous orbit where the satellite doesn't always display the same face to the orbited body, right?

Signed,
Bewildered in Buffalo

:^)

62 posted on 11/15/2002 5:52:23 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Isn't this, instead, an example of phase-locking, since the rotational period of Io matches the rotational period of Jupiter its orbital period?

Better.

63 posted on 11/15/2002 6:05:53 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Both are considered synchronous. You also can have a sun-synchronous orbit for a satellite where the satellite is still in orbit around the Earth.

see here is a good description of a sun-synchronous orbit:

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/970613a.html

and here we describe the synchronous orbit of our moon:

http://www.trib.com/WYOMING/NCSD/PLANETARIUM/synchronous.html

Your description is completely correct for the geosynchronous satellites at 22,300 (or so) miles over the equatorial belt.
64 posted on 11/15/2002 6:29:15 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
So if I follow you, a phase-locked satellite is also synchronous, but there are synchronous satellites that aren't phase-locked, right?
65 posted on 11/15/2002 6:31:42 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
heat waves?

The atmosphere is broken up optically by thermal-induced flow into cells about a yard or less in diameter, give or take. A telescope looking through one cell could be focused sharply, but you can see if a telescope mirror is 2 yards across, it will look through 4 such cells, each with different overall focal length. A solid mirror could not focus for all cells simultaneously, but one with adaptive optics could, to a degree.

66 posted on 11/15/2002 11:37:30 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson