[Knitebane]

What evidence? Let's have references.

As I'm not in the investigation itself, I don't have access to the investigative findings.

So, no hard data at the moment, only information from people close to it whose word I trust.

The facts will be out when the investigation is concluded.

I mean, hey, it's not like I'm asking you to just trust me that the source code that I use internally is the same as what I called "shared source." In this case, the truth will be out, it will just take a few weeks.

[Bush2000]

As I'm not in the investigation itself, I don't have access to the investigative findings. So, no hard data at the moment, only information from people close to it whose word I trust.

In other words, you're spreading rumor and innuendo, not fact. Can't you Linux guys distinguish between fact and fantasy? It's your wet dream for this incident to be blamed on some insider. But without actual proof, we'll just have to accept ZDNet's assessment of the situation as a hacked Linux server. Tough luck.