Canadiancapitalist wrote:
Pat Buchanan is not a libertarian. He's a paleo-con.Not anymore he isn't.
Pat left the ranks of conservatism when he joined the loony Reform Party.
Both Buchanan and Raimondo may be rightly called paleo-libertarians.
It's the crackpot populism that makes the difference.
Pat Buchanan is not libertarian by any stretch of the imagination. You either don't understand libertarianism or you have no idea where Pat Buchanan stands on issues. He's a protectionist, anti-immigration etc. etc.