Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miss Marple
In a recount, all you are doing is recounting the fraudulaent votes.

I was waiting for someone to say that. You could count the votes a hundred time and probably get very little variance.

If the DOJ investigators turn up irrefutable evidence of significant voter fraud, there may be a legal remedy. Admittedly, it is a long shot, and the fraud would have to be discovered very quickly now to have any chance, but there is probably little to be gained from just having a recount of the same votes over again.

48 posted on 11/14/2002 5:29:53 AM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: San Jacinto; Miss Marple
In a recount, all you are doing is recounting the fraudulaent votes.

This is not exactly true.
In a recount the number of fraudulent votes may increase.
This is what happened in the first Florida recount
where the number of Democrat votes increased significantly
in every county except 2.
Statistically such a result was impossibe if there was no fraud.

53 posted on 11/14/2002 5:48:34 AM PST by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson