And what happened with the thread that was posted stating that according to South Dakota election law, any 3 voters in a precinct could ask for a recount? Was this ever done?
I am not so much concerned about this one election as I am about the implications of these kind of Rat practices which they obviously have no conscience about. To the Rats, the end justifies the means no matter how dishonest, illegal or even dangerous the means might be. Because of this, I can't stop thinking that this election, by a twist of fate, could have had a very different result.
Suppose that the race had gone as they expected it to in Georgia, Colorado and Minnesota leaving either South Dakota or Arkansas, 2 of the states where fraud was out of control, as a tie breaker. I'd venture the guess that it would have gotten very ugly and that the Rats would still be in power. In other words they would have been rewarded for their cheating with victory. As it turned out, they focused their energies in the wrong places leaving Republicans a comfortable margin of victory in states they thought they had in the bag and the results in South Dakota and Arkansas are irrelevant in the overall Rat picture. Neither are "significant" victories. All they have gained is 2 impotent senators whose legitimacy will always be in question. But what I fear is that dropping the ball based on having won the senate anyway establishes a bad precedent and does nothing to help us in our efforts to keep elections honest and above board. Every time they cheat and get away with it, and especially if they win, they are encouraged to step up those efforts in the future. Isn't it time we call the Republican party to account BEFORE the next election?