Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scripter
Espousing a theory known as intelligent design, molecular biologist Michael Behe and others are attempting to forge a synthesis. Often — though inaccurately — described as creationism lite, intelligent design admits that evolution operates under current conditions but emphasizes that Darwin is silent on how those conditions came to be.

Strikingly inaccurate. This makes it sound as though ID is simply an attempt to answer the question of abiogenesis. But when many ID proponents start off with an a priori denial of macroevolution, it quite obviously goes way beyond that.

Beyond that, there's this, which is worth repeating:

The battle between evolutionary biology and faith isn't inevitable. As genome researcher Collins says, "I am unaware of any irreconcilable conflict between scientific knowledge about evolution and the idea of a creator God. Why couldn't God use the mechanism of evolution to create?"

Why, indeed...

8 posted on 11/14/2002 8:03:47 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
Why couldn't God use the mechanism of evolution to create?

God, being God could have used any method He wanted. The four "major camps" of young earth creation, ID, gradualism and punctuated equilibria disagree on the interpretation of the available evidence.

11 posted on 11/14/2002 8:17:57 AM PST by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: general_re
From the article:
Why the renewed scientific interest in spiritual thinking? One reason is the cyclical nature of intellectual fashions.

I think that explains it more than any specific scientific data.

29 posted on 11/14/2002 9:35:21 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: general_re
Strikingly inaccurate. This makes it sound as though ID is simply an attempt to answer the question of abiogenesis. But when many ID proponents start off with an a priori denial of macroevolution, it quite obviously goes way beyond that.

Indeed it does try to replace not just abiogenesis, but also evolution and materialist theories of the Universe. Nothing wrong with that except the scare tactics of evolutionists. What evolutionists do not admit is that as far as the Universe, abiogenesis and even about the reproductive process most scientists and scientifically proven facts in each field agree with ID. That's why the evo/materialist/atheists are scared.

74 posted on 11/14/2002 7:33:17 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson