Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just another Joe
My right vrs your right, let's say, just for argument, that they cancel each other out. Now how about we let the property owner decide. Could you buy that?

I'm sorry, Just another Joe, but we do not allow restaurant owners to determine restaurant use. If you want to talk about the broader topic of property rights we'd need to define that also, but anyone who owns a restaurant will tell you that they have hundreds of laws that restrict their unfettered use. I don't like property rights violations, but the fact is that the states have always placed restrictions on land use. When it tips too far, we form a mob...previously called voters...and work to bring us back to equilibrium.
208 posted on 11/13/2002 2:25:31 PM PST by Leonard210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: Leonard210
but we do not allow restaurant owners to determine restaurant use.

But we have, up till the current antismoking explosion, allowed them to decide what was allowed in their business if it did not affect the public health and it was legal.
Until that point they WERE allowed to decide.
If unequivical proof can be given that ETS affects the public health I will agree that the govt should be allowed to decide for the business owner.

211 posted on 11/13/2002 2:34:48 PM PST by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson