Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leonard210
Your conclusion that I have no response is the typical comment of someone who believes that since a law is a law it must be just (and aren't you just so clever?). The only problem with the antis is that they aren't content to force smokers outside or into designated areas...their ultimate objective is to make it illegal for us to smoke a legal product anywhere.

And don't think I missed the extra s in the word leading off your previous post before this one.

166 posted on 11/13/2002 1:25:13 PM PST by borisbob69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: borisbob69
And don't think I missed the extra s in the word leading off your previous post before this one.

My sincere apology. I did not intend that "s". I don't think that any arguments are unproductive. Your comment is true to a point, but my argument is with smokers who insist that they have a LEGAL RIGHT to smoke anywhere. Well, it's a fact that in many places they no longer have that LEGAL RIGHT.
177 posted on 11/13/2002 1:35:45 PM PST by Leonard210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson