Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I can't believe this isn't up. FR must be slipping! Especially for MetroSource newswire to have it before us.

Please tell me I missed a previous post. If I did then Please Zeke this thread.

prisoner6

1 posted on 11/12/2002 2:36:11 AM PST by prisoner6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: prisoner6
Here Come The Warm Jets
2 posted on 11/12/2002 2:37:11 AM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Aren't they debating again today? The story I read said that the Parliament rejected it, but then Uday, Saddam's son, supported it.

I am confused.

3 posted on 11/12/2002 2:38:32 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Haven't seen this yet. Fox News also reports that the Iraqi Parliament has rejected UN weapons inspections. They want Arabs on the teams and call for all Arab oil producing nations to stop selling oil to the west. They say the final decision is still up to Saddam
4 posted on 11/12/2002 2:38:48 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
The Iraqi Parliament is useless, Saddam holds all of the power.

Saddam might be planning to comply, at the last second.

6 posted on 11/12/2002 2:40:38 AM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/focus/news/search?s=iraq+rejects&m=all&o=time
7 posted on 11/12/2002 2:41:29 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
But Saddam may accept it (I doubt it). The parliment rejecting it was somewhat expected (to me anyway).
10 posted on 11/12/2002 2:44:12 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Iraqi Lawmakers Vote Down U.N. Plan
Iraqi Parliament Recommends Rejection of U.N. Resolution, Says Final Decision Is Saddam's

The Associated Press

BAGHDAD, Iraq Nov. 12 — Iraq's parliament on Tuesday unanimously recommended rejection of a U.N. resolution on weapons inspections, but said the final decision would be left to the country's top leadership.

The vote came hours after Saddam Hussein's son recommended that Iraq accept the resolution, but with the condition that inspection teams have Arab members.

According to a parliamentary resolution read during the session, the 250-member parliament accepted an earlier recommendation from its foreign relations committee.

"The council suggests rejection of the U.N. resolution," the resolution said.

It went on to say the "political leadership" should "adopt what it considers appropriate to defend the Iraqi people and Iraq's independence and dignity and authorizes President Saddam Hussein to adopt what he sees as appropriate expressing our full support for his wise leadership."

Parliament speaker Saadoun Hammadi asked deputies to vote on the first clause of the resolution by a show of hands and announced it had been accepted unanimously. It was not clear how many members were present for the vote.

Hammadi then called for a vote on the second clause referring the matter to Saddam, and again announced unanimous approval. A third vote was held for the entire proposal, and it also was approved unanimously.

Iraq has until Friday to accept or reject the resolution, which the U.N. Security Council approved unanimously last Friday. If it does not, or falters afterward in following the tough provisions of the resolution, the United States and Britain have made clear they will attack Iraq.

Tuesday's session of parliament was not broadcast live on Iraqi television, leaving Iraqis unaware of how the parliament was likely to vote. The opening and the vote were carried live by Al-Jazeera, the Qatari-based Arabic satellite channel. Iraqis cannot receive Al-Jazeera as the government bans satellite dishes.

The U.N. resolution demands inspectors have unrestricted access to any suspected weapons site and the right to interview Iraqi scientists outside the country and without Iraqi officials present both issues that could become points of dispute.

Iraq has insisted on respect for its sovereignty, an argument it has used in the past to restrict access to Saddam's palaces.

On Tuesday, Saddam's son, Odai Saddam Hussein, distributed a letter to parliament as it reconvened Tuesday recommending the acceptance of the U.N. ruling with conditions. The letter was also distributed to reporters in Baghdad by the Information Ministry.

"We have to agree to the U.N. Security Council resolution with limits on certain points, but not, we say, conditions," the president's son said.

"There should be Arab experts or technicians and monitors (on the inspection teams) who are familiar with the nuclear, chemical and biological side," he said.

Odai Saddam Hussein said acceptance would not necessarily ward off war, and spoke of a call to have Arab countries cut oil supplies to countries who attack Iraq.

"We have to know our enemy and that the U.N. resolution does not mean stopping him from committing military action," he said.

"We also have to take precautions and measures and here we have to ask the Arab countries to immediately cut oil supplies to those countries that launch a military strike or aggression on Iraq and to any country that allows foreign war planes to use their airports or offer logistic support for them for refueling," his letter said.

Arab oil producers have ignored similar calls from Iraq in the past, saying stopping sales was not in their interest.

Lawmakers On Monday denounced the resolution, the latest in a long effort to ensure Iraq scraps its weapons of mass destruction, despite the risk of war if Iraq rejects it.

The first legislator to speak Tuesday renewed the condemnation, calling the resolution "a roadmap for invading Iraq."

"Why do we discuss it when it is trap to create a pretext to attack Iraq," lawmaker Adnan Rashid asked.

The parliament's foreign relations committee has already recommended that Iraq reject the resolution. However, lawmakers have said they would ultimately trust any decision Saddam makes.

The Iraqi president has used parliament's action as cover for difficult decisions in the past, and the harsh rhetoric did not necessarily mean parliament would reject the proposal.

In Washington, President Bush's national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, rejected the legitimacy of parliament's debate on the resolution.

"One has to be a bit skeptical of the independence of the Iraqi parliament from Saddam Hussein," she said Monday. "I don't think anyone believes this is anything but an absolute dictatorship and this decision is up to Saddam Hussein."

She also said Iraq has no right to accept or reject the resolution. "They are obligated to accept, but the U.N. thought it best to ask for return-receipt requested," Rice said.

Iraq maintains it no longer has any weapons of mass destruction, and lawmaker Ismail Nasif Jassim called the 30-day period for Iraq to provide documents on its weapons programs "illogical and a way to provoke Iraq."

Jassim described the provision for interviewing scientists outside Iraq as "a violation of human rights because it demands of any Iraqi they want to interview to travel abroad with their family."


Copyright 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.


14 posted on 11/12/2002 2:53:17 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
This is just Saddam muddying the waters. With the "Parliment" recommending rejection, Saddam puts pressure on the other Arab states because they may have to come out and either support or oppose an attack. Countries like Syria, which voted for the UN resolution, will never support a US attack on Iraq. Saddam is trying to break the coalition. Then, at the last minutes on Friday (or possibly even after Friday) he will come out and accept the resolution. Then the real delaying tactics can begin.

It won't work. We are pretty much ready to go. We have the capability and the resolve. Delaying tactics by Saddam will only serve to bolster our case.

15 posted on 11/12/2002 3:00:26 AM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
What the Iraqi Parliment says is 100% meaningless. It is what Saddam says that counts.
18 posted on 11/12/2002 3:08:09 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Wow, Iraq has a "parliament"
19 posted on 11/12/2002 3:10:52 AM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
You can't believe this isn't up? I can't believe I AM UP! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ;-) Thanks for posting it. :-)
22 posted on 11/12/2002 3:17:05 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Heard on Fox and Friends this morning that Saddam's son thinks they should accept it but have Arab inspectors involved who know about biological and nuclear weapons.
23 posted on 11/12/2002 3:18:39 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Don't be fooled. This is all going according Saddam's plan.

Bush claimed to want "Regime Change". Then he backedoff and said that if Saddam disarmed the regime would change. Now Saddam is going to show that despite the fact that his parliamentary stooges are telling him to fight. He has "changed" and is willing to do what it takes for there to be peace.

It really seems quite obvious. His son is just playing his part. Turn off the jets, the inspectors are going in . . . . for now!
25 posted on 11/12/2002 3:25:38 AM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Isn't November 22, a new Moon
26 posted on 11/12/2002 3:26:35 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Iraq Parliment . . lol that's funny.
27 posted on 11/12/2002 3:38:09 AM PST by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
I saw this on C-Minus NN.

The reporter was shameful. Absolutely shameful.

She reported it as a given that the Iraqi "Parliment" is a legitimate and democratic legislative body.

She said "a host of Iraqi leaders must examine this ruling."

What! There are no leaders in Iraq except their dictator! A ruling? Ha!

Thanks CNN for not dissapointing me. You are as terrible as ever.

31 posted on 11/12/2002 4:33:27 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
How many votes in the Iraqi Parliament are needed to override a Saddam veto?
35 posted on 11/12/2002 4:49:24 AM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Another ploy by Saddam to delay and polarize. The demand by Saddam's son to include Arab inspectors signals the Arab souk mentality. Saddam will try to negotiate conditions over the inspection regime and then eventually cave giving him more time to hide and disperse his weapons. The US should stand firm that there is no negotiating over conditions and that if an unconditional acceptance is not received from Saddam by Friday, military action will be taken. Hopefully, we will not have to go back to the Security Council to address Saddam's "concerns." You can bet the French and others will be more than happy to broker another solution consuming even more time.
37 posted on 11/12/2002 4:51:15 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6
Iraq Parliment REJCTS UN resolution

"Iraq parliment" is an oxymoron.

38 posted on 11/12/2002 4:57:25 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prisoner6; Gunrunner2; IronJack; belmont_mark; Scholastic; Askel5; SLB
This is a ploy. The Iraqi Congress has rejected the UN ultimatum unanimously. Now, it is Saddam's turn to step in and play the statesman by agreeing to the UN resolution in the interests of peace. Even if Saddam were to fully comply (which he probably won't in the end), I think war is certain because President Bush is set on invasion to avenge his father. Latest radio "intel" indicates that Saddam has distributed one million nerve gas "antidotes" to his troops in furtherance of what I have been saying for months--the US is going to take CBR casualties from a Saddam who thanks to US policy has nowhere to go and nothing to lose.
40 posted on 11/12/2002 5:36:34 AM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson