Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
Arrogance is always unwise. Boortz is exactly right.

The critical consideration isn't particular issues. Nor is it the newly revealed willingness of the electorate to "trust" the GOP with federal power. It's something simpler and more ominous, with very long term implications.

The Democrats are the masters of a political tactic against which even unshakeable facts and evidence will always fight an uphill struggle. That tactic is special-interest coalition building.

To build coalitions of special interests, one looks for groups that vote as a bloc around single issues, and promises them what they want. Look at the Democratic base. Its members don't agree on anything! It fragments into special interests as soon as you focus on it. Their common thread is that they all believe that Democratic officeholders will support their special interests. And how diverse those interests are:

I could go on, of course, but there's no real need. Noteworthily, the Democrats managed to tick off a critical special interest group -- firearms enthusiasts -- in 2000 and thus made George Bush President of the United States. It was their one really important error.

The central question for conservatives is how to counter this tactic. Conservatives can't use the tactic; it involves promising to pay Peter out of Paul's pocket, which is antithetical to the principles of individual liberty and limited government. But it is axiomatic that the Left will continue to use the tactic. As Boortz notes above, 97% of all federal revenue is generated by the upper 50% of the economy. Peter is indeed paying Paul for the privilege of remaining out of jail.

There remains much work to be done. Let the new GOP majorities in Congress set to their tasks, and let us set to ours -- finding a true counter-agent to the politics of plunder that the Democrats and the special interests to which they pander have wielded so sucessfully for so long.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

11 posted on 11/12/2002 4:34:57 AM PST by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fporretto
As Boortz notes above, 97% of all federal revenue is generated by the upper 50% of the economy.
And as Ron Paul notes...ARE YOUR TAXES TOO LOW?
In fact, a family needs only an income of about $53,000 to find themselves in the top 25% of all taxpayers.
And the good Lord help you if you're single/divorced. Your take home pay is horrible.
And look...In fact, earners in the top half account for 96% of income tax revenues, while the bottom half pays only 4%.
He says almost the same thing, or maybe NB does.
So what is it...18-20k (or somewhere thereabouts) and you're in the top 50%?
For example, the average poverty threshold for a family of four was $17,029 in 1999 and $13,359 in 1990.
Well, can't tax the poor...or maybe you can...
A little old in information (circa 1995), but the graphs and stuff are nice...
The U.S. Income Tax Burden:
The Federal Tax Burden...
How Much Do They Make? 1999 (Projected)
Highest 20% - $132,000
Fourth 20% - $53,000
Middle 20% - $35,400
Second 20% - $21,200
Lowest 20% - $8,400

Well, 35k for the top 50%, 21k for the top 25%. Surviving on $8400 in 1999? I don't see it.
Isn't it odd that the populations in each of these 20% groups are roughly the same.
12 posted on 11/12/2002 5:45:00 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: fporretto
Preliminary Estimates of Effective Tax Rates September 7, 1999
13 posted on 11/12/2002 5:46:20 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson