Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aristeides
There is a line in the article that states the clintons, both of them, back him as chairman. Also noted that he was elected 2 years ago for a four year term. So, in order to get rid of him, he'll have to resign. I think he's got way too much hubris in him to do that.

Personally, I think it is great having McAuliffe as the dems lead guy. When pitted against Marc Racicot, McAuliffe looks and acts like the total slimeball he is.

McAuliffe, Pelosi, McDermott - these are the faces of the democrat party. It ain't pretty, unless you are a Republican!

30 posted on 11/12/2002 8:38:29 AM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Wphile
There is a line in the article that states the clintons, both of them, back him as chairman.

Of course. The Clintons are, above all, duplicitous. Do you think this article would have appeared in the NY Times without the Clintons' approval?

32 posted on 11/12/2002 8:45:09 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson