Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hellinahandcart
That is odd. I cut and pasted it, it's a typo on the page I got it from. Or else even the NYT archives are biased :).

Unfortunately my research led me to what Ms. Q was probably thinking about when she wrote that. In 1980 the Republicans dropped support for the ERA, pretty much dooming it. I haven't gotten far enough to clear up just why they did that, although I suspect that the SCOTUS decision that the Civil Rights Act could be twisted to mean quotas had something to do with it.
50 posted on 11/12/2002 7:20:07 AM PST by m1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: m1911
Doesn't matter. The fact remains that more Democrats were against extending the franchise to women than were FOR. Republicans? Exactly the opposite.

Same with Civil Rights legislation in the sixties. That's why I found your info so interesting.

As for the ERA, that one got stopped in its tracks because it was such a turkey. Badly written and wide open to creative abuses. I doubt it would pass TODAY even with half the country gone daffy and muddleheaded.
51 posted on 11/12/2002 8:05:58 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: m1911
In 1980 the Republicans dropped support for the ERA, pretty much dooming it. I haven't gotten far enough to clear up just why they did that,

I've been told we have the great Phyllis Schlafly to thank for practically single-handedly seeing to the demise of the ERA.

57 posted on 11/12/2002 11:08:15 PM PST by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson