Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Astronauts Bumped from Flight [STS-113]
Associated Press via ABC News ^ | November 9, 2002 | NASA

Posted on 11/09/2002 12:27:47 PM PST by snopercod

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. Nov. 9 — It was bad enough when a medical problem sidelined one astronaut, but then a back injury forced another off space shuttle Endeavour's upcoming flight, sending shock waves through the crew.

Not since Apollo 13 had a career astronaut, let alone two, been bumped from an impending U.S. space shot because of health concerns.

"We were joking a lot about being Number 113," said Kenneth Bowersox, who at last check was still fit for Monday's launch and a lengthy space station stay. He suggested, during lighter moments, changing the mission's STS-113 designation.

For the record, Endeavour's flight to the international space station remains Space Transportation System No. 113. The mission patch plays it safe, though, and goes with Roman numerals: CXIII.

Seven astronauts will be aboard Endeavour, including eleventh-hour fill-ins Donald Pettit and Paul Lockhart.

Pettit will spend the winter aboard the space station with Bowersox and Russian Nikolai Budarin. Lockhart, Endeavour's pilot, will deliver them and bring back the three who have been living on the orbiting complex since June.

Pettit and Lockhart were upgraded over the summer. For Apollo 13, the countdown was already under way in 1970 when the switch in command module pilots occurred. Thomas "Ken" Mattingly was exposed to German measles and replaced by Jack Swigert on what was to become an even more star-crossed mission.

Pettit was training in Russia as the space station backup for Donald Thomas when Bowersox broke the news in July: Pettit was in and Thomas was out. NASA's medical experts had been debating for months whether Thomas should be grounded because of an undisclosed issue and finally ordered that the two Donalds be swapped.

"It was one of those things that was right on the line," said Bowersox, the expedition commander. "I had trouble sleeping before it happened because I was so worried about which way we should go and what was right and what was wrong and the best way to handle it."

A couple weeks later, in August, shuttle pilot Christopher "Gus" Loria became the second casualty after hurting his back at home. Because Lockhart had just flown to the space station on Endeavour in June, NASA asked him to step in.

Lockhart told his flabbergasted wife, who had been planning their vacation: "There's no need to finish getting the passports. We're not going to Germany and Austria."

For Bowersox, the pilot swap was "an even bigger shock" than having Pettit suddenly on board. Bowersox and his station crew were still in Russia and had no clue anything was amiss.

Pettit and his wife, meanwhile, were stunned by their own turn of events although perhaps less so since he had been training all along as a backup. But the impact on their lives was greater since Pettit was departing on a four-month station mission, rather than an 11-day shuttle flight. For starters, he was going to miss his twin boys' second birthday.

Worse yet, NASA already had delivered the meals and clothes for the upcoming space station crew, leaving Pettit stuck with Thomas' selections.

Thomas filled his advance shipments with chocolate, but no coffee. Pettit needs two cups of Java a day and craves green chili, not chocolate. So he's stashed instant coffee and northern New Mexico's finest green chili aboard Endeavour.

Because Pettit is taller than Thomas, he's taking up some pants along with bigger size-13 shoes. The shirts already on the space station should more or less fit. At least the name "Don" on the shirts is a perfect match.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: apollo13; spaceshuttle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
This is not good. I feel sorry for the Flight Crew Systems guys that have to repack all the lockers.
1 posted on 11/09/2002 12:27:47 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; anymouse
flag
2 posted on 11/09/2002 12:30:40 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
'splain that to us Lucy....
3 posted on 11/09/2002 12:32:30 PM PST by Doctor Raoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Interesting that a back problem got someone bumped. When my back acts up, I often wish I could float around in outer space.
4 posted on 11/09/2002 12:39:16 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Astronauts, from left, Don Thomas, John Herrington, and Christoper 'Gus' Loria, pose in this Jan. 2002 NASA photograph, from the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Tex.  Both Thomas and Loria were bumped from the STS-113 mission for medical reasons. Herrington is scheduled to be the first American-Indian to fly in space when the shuttle Endeavour lifts off early Monday morning Nov. 11, 2002 (AP Photo/NASA)
Sat Nov 9,10:02 AM ET

Astronauts, from left, Don Thomas, John Herrington, and Christoper 'Gus' Loria, pose in this Jan. 2002 NASA (news - web sites) photograph, from the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Tex. Both Thomas and Loria were bumped from the STS-113 mission for medical reasons. Herrington is scheduled to be the first American-Indian to fly in space when the shuttle Endeavour lifts off early Monday morning Nov. 11, 2002 (AP Photo/NASA)

5 posted on 11/09/2002 12:40:36 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Down on the middeck, the whole forward bulkhead is covered with "lockers" - drawers that contain "stuff" for the mission. Each Astronaut has his own personal clothing, food selections, books to read, music, etc. Plus, there is emergency equipment specifically sized to each astronaut. All that stuff has to be weighed, for CG considerations.

Many of the lockers are loaded into the crew module during the final part of the launch countdown, since they contain perishable items.

Try and picture a busy restaurant with all the waitstaff and bussboys having to crawl through a 36" dia crew hatch with their food and trays, and you get some idea of what a bottleneck FCS Stowage can be during launch countdown.

6 posted on 11/09/2002 1:12:01 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
This is bad news considering the shuttle is going to launch on Monday.
7 posted on 11/09/2002 1:39:35 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
My point exactly. The launch countdown has already started, the planning meeting have all been held, the numbers have all been crunched...and now this. People have no concept of what it takes to pull off one of these launch countdowns.

It's going to be painful for the launch team, as well as the Astronauts. FCS stowage is a major, MAJOR part of the launch countdown planning. Getting the spaceship ready to launch has to be interwoven with loading all the "stuff" into the Crew Hatch and stowing it properly. If you forget the toilet paper, you're in big trouble, 'cause you can't stop at the Jiffy Store once on orbit.

The crew module is small, and the floor is now a wall (in the vertical), and only so many people can be inside at once due to "confined space" (OHSA) regulations. (I think it's ten - twelve in an emergency - but memory fades.)

One can only hope that the new guys don't end up spending six months on the Station wearing somebody else's clothes.

I wish the launch team well. They're pros, and will pull a rabbit out of a hat like they always do. (Then Houston will take the credit, like they always do.)

8 posted on 11/09/2002 1:55:56 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Right on. Most people don't realize that the crews getting the shuttle ready to launch, as well as the crew themselves, are going to be pulling some all-nighters to be ready to launch on Monday.
9 posted on 11/09/2002 2:43:58 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; PatrickHenry
"Deja vu all over again"?
10 posted on 11/09/2002 2:47:27 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The countdown runs round-the-clock, so "all nighters" are a given. The last one I worked [John Glenn launch], I was on-console for 14 hours straight.

The problems occur when there is simply too much work to cram into too little time. The "built in holds" allow for a certain amount of catch-up if things get backed up, but you can only do so much. Especially with these 5 minute windows thanks to the hi-inclination orbit of the station.

11 posted on 11/09/2002 2:52:57 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Not good news
12 posted on 11/09/2002 3:26:45 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
That makes sense. I can sort of relate to this. In my Navy nuclear power days (I was on a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier), we always had to start of up the propulsion plant 30-36 hours before getting underway. Starting up that early gave us time to identify and tweak any maintenance problems. If anything major developed, you better believe that we were busting butt and pulling all-nighters to get it fixed.

If the ship has to go to sea Monday morning, that's the last word, period. Captains lose their job if they can't get underway on time, and life becomes hell for the crew (the old axiom of crap rolling downhill). When the JFK couldn't pass the required maintenance checks to go to sea safely, the Captain got fired and the crew forfeited Christmas leave to get it fixed.

13 posted on 11/09/2002 4:11:15 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Thanks for the info. Very interesting.
14 posted on 11/09/2002 4:43:31 PM PST by Doctor Raoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
The problems occur when there is simply too much work to cram into too little time. The "built in holds" allow for a certain amount of catch-up if things get backed up, but you can only do so much. Especially with these 5 minute windows thanks to the hi-inclination orbit of the station.

Been there. :-( I have been on console for launches. We usually rehersed for months.

15 posted on 11/09/2002 9:02:05 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Yes, but have you FReeped from Mission Control? :)
16 posted on 11/10/2002 12:15:43 AM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Goddard?
17 posted on 11/10/2002 3:21:52 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
When my back acts up, I often wish I could float around in outer space.

That would be nice, if not for the several G's you have to pull getting there - ouch!
18 posted on 11/10/2002 3:38:17 AM PST by GodBlessRonaldReagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Fom A Government terminal? Never! From my radio telescope project control room late at night, when nothing was happening, yup.
19 posted on 11/10/2002 6:44:23 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
JPL :-)
20 posted on 11/10/2002 6:44:38 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson