Why don't you point out in your pretty little picture you posted exactly what the author of the article is referring to then, since you obviously know what you're talking about.
The article is a lie.
The info on DARPA and the info you posted show nothing that relates to what the author is ranting about.
NYTimes, says it all.
The article is a lie. The info on DARPA and the info you posted show nothing that relates to what the author is ranting about. NYTimes, says it all. But...but, but the posters up and down this thread trust the NYTimes....
Do you actually mean that the NYTimes is not a freedom fighting publication and that they would actually print false information?
Why don't you point out in your pretty little picture you posted exactly what the author of the article is referring to then, since you obviously know what you're talking about. What is it exactly that you can't understand here? Is it that you need glasses?
The article is a lie.
Perhaps you want us all to think that. Do you think it best that we ignore this and keep our fingers crossed?
The info on DARPA and the info you posted show nothing that relates to what the author is ranting about.
And how do you figure that?
NYTimes, says it all.
Favorite propaganda trick of all time, smear and discredit the messenger.