Will you agree that *if* the information in the article is accurate, then this massive surveillance system should be opposed?
Any information in this article that turns out to be true *and* is a violation of the following must be opposed.
Amendment V -- "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."