Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the sweep? Voters see need for grown-ups
The Charlotte Observer ^ | 11-9-02 | KATHLEEN PARKER

Posted on 11/09/2002 4:42:38 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2002 4:42:38 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Good post!
2 posted on 11/09/2002 4:48:14 AM PST by looney tune
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Besides, beyond the Beltway are millions of people who see George W. Bush not as a bumbling fool, but as a thoroughly nice guy with a good heart and a good-enough brain.

The "good-enough brain" part is actually understatement. People with President Bush's academic and other accomplishments (dullards don't graduate from Harvard's Business School, can't learn to fly a fighter jet and don't have a net worth of some $16 million earned by themselves) have very high IQ's.

3 posted on 11/09/2002 4:54:54 AM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
I misworded that a bit. Substitute for "dullards" "people of average ability."
4 posted on 11/09/2002 4:59:11 AM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Having Jim McDermott and David Bonior implying in Baghdad that they trust Saddam Hussein more than they trust George Bush didn't help the Democrats at all.
5 posted on 11/09/2002 4:59:25 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is a little off subject, but keep in mind the huge amount of invective that will pour from the media. They will hate republicans like they have never hated them before. All the more reason to support and communicate with your elected republican representatives.

This country is at war. The adults are back in charge. The dems think that we're just a bunch a racist, anti-poor, anti-homeless, anti-black, anti-minority, anti-queer, anti-welfare, anti-environment, anti-union rednecks. Then it comes to saving the country, all those groups and their incessant "gimmie, gimmie" whining are irrevelant.

6 posted on 11/09/2002 5:10:34 AM PST by glockmeister40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glockmeister40
The Democrats remind me of six year olds complaining that they're not allowed to do whatever they please. That's right and they got slapped on their behinds for misbehavin.' Now its time for them to grow up if they ever want to be entrusted with the serious life and death responsibility of power again.
7 posted on 11/09/2002 5:13:51 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
The "good-enough brain" part is actually understatement. People with President Bush's academic and other accomplishments (dullards don't graduate from Harvard's Business School, can't learn to fly a fighter jet and don't have a net worth of some $16 million earned by themselves) have very high IQ's.

Just some food for thought - Which 20th century presidents had/have the highest IQs?

Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon.

Not meaning to slight the intelligent here, but the author says Bush is intelligent enough, and it clearly bears out in the analysis.

8 posted on 11/09/2002 5:24:21 AM PST by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
.....Americans with war and national security on their minds have wearied, too, of partisan bickering.....

The fact is, little changed. the different camps are so even that most of the Congress remained the same as it was.

The Republican attack across the country was focused on those areas where an attack with maximum available resources was possible and given some measure of potential success. Maximum available is different from overwhelming force/resources that was not possible. Some of those focused attacks were successful and some were repulsed.

The success rate was barely adequate. A followon attack will be made in LA to increase the total success.

Where the attacks were successful, the number of minds changed was small. Most voters voted the previously entrenched positions. A few voters were in fact frightened and voted for personal physical security over personal economic security.

The Republicans did not win an overwhelming victory. They gained control and now must act to change the minds of entrenched Rats as well as more of those in the middle with no permanent convictions.

9 posted on 11/09/2002 5:24:24 AM PST by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
Bush passes the real-people test, and real people outnumber pundits on Election Day. People trust him. They recognize him. They know he won't try to seduce their daughters or play games that don't involve a ball, a bat or a hoop.

============================================================

Why is it that even the lowest form of animals learn from their mistakes, yet the Dumb-O-Loser can't learn from theirs?

I believe that they believe that the American voters are all morons and need to be told how to vote.

The same tired,old tricks that worked for the perverted klinton era is still being used. They are allowing this vile, lying, perverted pig to make fools of them while he continues to recieve huge sums of money. They are also setting themselve up to again make the same mistakes by fawning over his also perverted "wife".

They have no new ideas, programs or direction.

I can only recommemnd that all Dumb-O-Loser leadership be required to study the lower form of life, see how they learn from their mistakes and see if they can also learn.

But then again, never mind it's to much fun watching you eat your own and totally destroy yourselves.

10 posted on 11/09/2002 5:29:36 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
"Which 20th century presidents had/have the highest IQs?"

"Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon."

You missed one. Jimmuh Cahtah was right up there in the brains department (in fact, Walter Crankcase said that ole Jimmuh was the smartest president he had ever seen, being able to digest and retain huge masses of detail). Of course, Jimmuh was an incompetent president....which just goes to show that leadership ability doesn't necessarily accrue to the smartest lad on the block.

11 posted on 11/09/2002 5:41:07 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bert
A few voters were in fact frightened and voted for personal physical security over personal economic security.

No. That implies that voting democrat would somehow be good for the economy and voting Republican would somehow be harmful to the economy. That's just a democrat myth.

12 posted on 11/09/2002 5:58:08 AM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I couldn't have said it better myself. Having grown up in Minnesota and now living in New Jersey for 16 years, I still see quite the chasm between the East Coast establishment and mainstream America.
13 posted on 11/09/2002 6:03:05 AM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Living out in the sticks has its advantages."

The understatement of the month. --SB (from The Middle of Nowhere)

14 posted on 11/09/2002 6:03:48 AM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bttt.

5.56mm

15 posted on 11/09/2002 6:07:47 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alnick
....That's just a democrat myth....

You are correct in this statement but may misunderstand my other point. I am considering the microeconomy of personal finances. Macro economic considerations are irrelevant for the few I think are involved in the recent election.

The challange on the macroeconomy is more fundamental and moves the base. That is, to change the 43% entrenched in addition to the 12% in the middle.

16 posted on 11/09/2002 6:15:12 AM PST by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Finally! I've been on the kids vs. adults bandwagon for a long time. However, it wasn't until my daughter turned 14 that it really hit home. It is amazing to compare the logic she employs in our discourse with her with that of Mssrs. Clainton, McCauliff, et al. It's exactly the same as what comes from the democrats. They really have become the PPP (Party of Peter Pan) in that they have never grown up.
17 posted on 11/09/2002 6:17:55 AM PST by Crawdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Just some food for thought - Which 20th century presidents had/have the highest IQs? Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon. Not meaning to slight the intelligent here, but the author says Bush is intelligent enough, and it clearly bears out in the analysis.

Having a high IQ doesn't mean diddly squat without the common sense to drive it. My cousin's IQ is off the charts... but he works at Pizza Hut (40 yrs old). He was one semester away from a Master's in Physics before dropping out of the "establishment". Now......most people I know would call that STUPID. *chuckle*

18 posted on 11/09/2002 6:25:18 AM PST by LaineyDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Spot on article! !!!!!!
19 posted on 11/09/2002 7:04:50 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
The "good-enough brain" part is actually understatement. People with President Bush's academic and other accomplishments (dullards don't graduate from Harvard's Business School, can't learn to fly a fighter jet and don't have a net worth of some $16 million earned by themselves) have very high IQ's.

Bush is “the millionaire next door” sort of guy. Everyone knows he has it but he acts just like the rest of us. He doesn’t make us feel small or carry even a whiff of an “I am SO much better then you” attitude. Your nice middle class son probably could ask his daughter for a date without daddy getting upset.

To put it in a nutshell, he likes us and we return the favor high IQ, big bank account and all. As opposed to those mentioned who have very high IQ’s (maybe) but give us the impression that they hold us in contempt.

a.cricket

20 posted on 11/09/2002 7:05:30 AM PST by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson