Skip to comments.
Report: Pataki Might Purchase Champlain Property
TheChamplainChannel.com ^
Posted on 11/08/2002 6:57:18 PM PST by rs79bm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: hole_n_one
Sorry about that. The original title was "Rumor: Pataki may be Bush's running mate in 2004".
Does that help?
To: redlipstick
you think Graham will retire? That would be a huge favor to the state!
62
posted on
11/08/2002 7:36:04 PM PST
by
votelife
To: Sidebar Moderator
I can't begin to tell you how touched I am........
you're the first person that has taken seriously anything I've posted within at least the past 2 years.
To: rs79bm
I'm disappointed to see people being so testy with each other on this thread. You'd think it was the Dems who had the historic victory 72 hours ago. Let's leave the nasty intra-party bickering to them.
My own two cents says that W is, of course, a man of his word, and when he says Cheney will be his running mate, that is the end of the matter.
Of course if Cheney is unable to run, that's another thing. But even in such case, I agree with those who say the odds of W picking an ardent pro-choice running mate like Pataki = 0.
Even so, I'm not going to jump down the throat of those who have a different outlook.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I'm disappointed to see people being so testy with each other on this thread. You'd think it was the Dems who had the historic victory 72 hours ago. Let's leave the nasty intra-party bickering to them. Wrather than chastise the entire forum, why don't you direct your "disapointment" towards the author of this (now corrected) speciously titled post?
To: hole_n_one
Wrather s/b rather......
.....as in the CBS Evening News with Dan Wrather
To: hole_n_one
Certainly didn't mean to criticize the entire forum, just those involved in the fairly nasty back-and-forth. If there's ever been a time for us to be in a good mood, particularly among ourselves . . .
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Certainly didn't mean to criticize the entire forum, just those involved in the fairly nasty back-and-forth. If there's ever been a time for us to be in a good mood, particularly among ourselves . . .Imagine that, even after all that, FR still has standards.
To: hole_n_one
I think we can all agree. Sometimes people on here get a little terrotorial and ruin it for everybody.
69
posted on
11/08/2002 9:27:20 PM PST
by
rs79bm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson