Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shrinkermd
Does this mean that the right is done with rummaging through everyone's sex life? I vaguely remember some discussion a couple of years ago concerning some politician's sex life. Seemed like some people couldn't let go of it....
92 posted on 11/08/2002 6:42:26 PM PST by fent1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: fent1968
put up or shut up
98 posted on 11/08/2002 6:48:58 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: fent1968
It's really interresting that you brought up the sex life thing.

After over two years of diversion and obstruction there was finally enough evidence to bring Clinton up on charges.

During this long time of stonewalling by the Clinton's, another matter sprung up. The selling of state secrets for campaign cash.

The evidence was being gathered while the nation was watching the "Monika" proceedings. At the time the "Monika" affair was drawing to a close the final bits of evidence had been established for the prosecution of Clinton for treason. The long drawn out affair, thanks to stonewalling by the Clinton's and the cover of the press, had the American public sick of the whole mess. The repeated mantra of 40 mil for the cost of the panel was a very good talking point to the uninformed. Never mind that one Clinton trip to India & Paki cost 100 mil in one week.

It was determined that at the time the evidence had been gathered for the treason charges the public would never tollerate another prosecution of Bill Clinton. They had lost focus.

The ultimate responsibillity for this should rest with all those members of the Senate that never bothered to review the assembled evidence for the "Monika" trial. They voted to acquit a person without reviewing the evidence. They should be ashamed.

I wonder what was in those 900 FBI files Hillary has? How much can we trust those people in DC?

138 posted on 11/08/2002 7:38:08 PM PST by cibco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: fent1968
Sex life? No, I don't recall anything like that.

We did have threads about perjury and lying to the American People if that's the one you're writing about.
144 posted on 11/08/2002 7:48:02 PM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: fent1968
Please define "everyone".
158 posted on 11/08/2002 8:20:59 PM PST by mountainfolk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: fent1968
I vaguely remember some discussion a couple of years ago concerning some politician's sex life. Seemed like some people couldn't let go of it....

Then you've apparently forgotten that there were several, including a member of the USSC who the 'Rats couldn't let go of the sex lives of....

202 posted on 11/08/2002 11:13:34 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: fent1968
Does this mean that the right is done with rummaging through everyone's sex life? I vaguely remember some discussion a couple of years ago concerning some politician's sex life. Seemed like some people couldn't let go of it....

As usual, that is the myth you libs try to pass to the public. The right cared about perjury, obstruction of justice and RAPE. That is what your guy did. Maybe he got BJ's in the oval office at the same time he was discussing using our military, but he committed crimes and got away with it.

215 posted on 11/09/2002 7:35:19 PM PST by saminfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: fent1968
Bwahaa, You still think it's about sex don't you? You dims are all still stuck in 1st gear.
227 posted on 11/11/2002 7:58:10 AM PST by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson