Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Gets Blue - It’s a red country now
NRO ^ | October 8, 2002 | Bill Whalen

Posted on 11/08/2002 11:21:24 AM PST by gubamyster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: gubamyster
Hehe, what is good about this article is not what it says but what it doesn't say. This 'start from the status quo last time and modify from there' analysis overlooks the fact that the support that Gore had then is unlikely to materialize in '04, especially after the post-election debacle. If Gore is the nominee in '04, forget 2.5% bounce, even 5% bounce, it would rather be a 10% or more, 400+ electoral vote bonanza for Bush.

If its somebody else, we can only hope its somebody like Gephardt or Gray Davis, we're talking '84 repeat. Look what happened in MD when Gore showed up...instant death for KKT, and that was a heavy blue state. Heh.

21 posted on 11/08/2002 1:27:00 PM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

22 posted on 11/08/2002 1:28:45 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I realized Perot played a big part...

A big part? How about a decisive blow.

1992

William J. Clinton, Democrat 370 electoral 44,908,233 popular

George H. W. Bush, Republican 168 electoral 39,102,282 popular

H. Ross Perot, Independent . . . 19,741,048

23 posted on 11/08/2002 1:28:45 PM PST by AmusedBystander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 537 Votes
If we can simultaneously court the Hispanic vote while stopping illegal immigration (it's not really in the best interest of legal-citizen Hispanics, you know), the Republican Party might just have a future.

Add to that showing the new generation of Black voters that the Dems are taking their vote for granted, while Republican ideas such as school vouchers, elimination of the death tax, SS privatization, and merit rather than quotas are in their best interests.

24 posted on 11/08/2002 1:30:23 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander
That would be a big part.
25 posted on 11/08/2002 1:34:52 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
They are going to go left, because that's where the money is, the greedy little whores.
26 posted on 11/08/2002 2:10:53 PM PST by NYpeanut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Coop
This Bush is not like his father at all and he has evidently learned from his mistakes. The elder Bush's downfall was that he was never a likeable guy. Certainly he was a proper, dignified man who served his country well. But he was perceived as being rather elitish, goofy, too "Ivy League". In sort, a preppie. Men ridiculed him for being a wimp (ironically Bush was far from a wimp as his service in WW2 points out). Women found him very stiff and formal, even patronizing. The elder Bush had the good fortune to run against somebody even dorkier then him (Mike Dukakis), otherwise, he might never have been elected president at all. Despite all of that, Bush still might have beaten Clinton in 1992 had he not backed down on his "no new taxes" pledge. This was the one thing that brought Bush down. Conservatives felt betrayed and abandoned him in droves. Then Perot came along and tapped into that mood. Most of Perot's votes came from disaffected 1988 Bush voters who felt that they could trust no politician from the two major parties again.

Breaking that "no new taxes" pledge was the worst thing to happen to the Republican party since Richard Nixon decided to stonewall and obstruct with Watergate. It was devastating to the party and Clinton got eight years to drag this country into the gutter.

The younger Bush is so different from the father that if they didn't look so much alike, one might be tempted to ask for a DNA test to prove it. Unlike his father, GWB is likeable in a "down-home" kind of way. You don't get those preppy "Ivy-League" vibes from GWB at all. Furthermore, when GWB speaks, he means it. He's got integrity. People trust him. He will never go back on an important campaign pledge like his father did, especially since he knows all too well the consequences of doing so.

So while it is true that the elder Bush had sky-high ratings during the Persian Gulf crisis, those ratings were short-lived and a direct result of the war and they plummetted as a direct result of the economy. Here we are over a year after GWB's historic moment (9/11) and his popularity is just incredible. And these aren't "wartime" ratings. We haven't been engaged in battle in a major way since the beginning of this year and the economy is far worse today than it was during 1991 and 1992. These ratings (still approaching 70%) are for real. Imagine what they will be when the stock markets start soaring again and Sadaam Hussein is finally removed from power!

27 posted on 11/08/2002 2:31:07 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I'm familiar with all that happened. My point was and still is - many people felt Bush the Elder was nearly unbeatable. We were wrong.

Many here feel Bush the Sequel is unbeatable. We don't know what the next 24 months will bring.

28 posted on 11/12/2002 6:22:33 AM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza; PARodrig
btt
29 posted on 11/12/2002 7:26:59 AM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson