[Phaedrus]

His work has led him to believe that it is impossible to simulaneously evolve 50 specialized genes to give the bacteria this component and there are no intermediate functionalities that could use only some of the genes while the others "evolve' to produce the final function. What is left? Weak arguments for "puncuated equilibrium?"

With the rediscovery of "intelligent design" as it relates to Evolution, I think the "cat is out of the bag" and it's only a matter of time before Darwinism is finally buried.

There are a lot of ostriches out there, though, who call themselves scientists.

All of science was founded on the premises that the universe is intelligently designed and that, with diligent effort, we mere humans can discern at least some of that design. While we have much yet to learn, we have been remarkably successful in this effort.

The Luddites with blinders, it turns out, are the Darwinists, who can see only cold, Godless Material.

[Nebullis]

All of science was founded on the premises that the universe is intelligently designed and that, with diligent effort, we mere humans can discern at least some of that design.

The understanding that the scientific method can be used to discern the design of the universe is a good start, Phaedrus. Don't confuse this with using science to discern knowledge of God. For that the methodology of science is beside the point. And you are back to religion or philosophy, not science.