[lewislynn]

You're not very bright, are you?

Well, unlike you I don't have a problem with answering simple questions.

Context, dear. Read some of the follow-ups to your idiotic post.

Can't answer for yourself? I've read everything addressed to me. I don't have any control over cowards who talk behind other peoples backs.

Speaking of idiocy, my post in question was #66. My question for you Einstein, was for your response #67....Though you aren't capable of answering simple questions or clarifying your idiocy, I'll ask anyway. Was there something in-between #66 and #67 I missed?

[Calico Cat]

All right, here goes. Repetition is necessary to pound sense into hard little skulls, evidently.

To paraphrase your post #66: "Don't give them (the anti-smoking Nazis) a reason to come after you."

By implication, you're agreeing that those who seek to impose the State's will on private-property owners ARE Nazis. So, per your reasoning, we should ignore the fact that they are acting in a totalitarian and intolerant fashion and alter our behavior (which is perfectly legal) so as to not bring their wrath upon ourselves.

Why on Earth would a conservative advocate that?

Got it?

I doubt it.

[Calico Cat]

Also read post #77. I directed it at Max McGarrity and thought that I included you, but I didn't. I'm sorry, I should have done that.