Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coop; Torie; ambrose
Any explanations on why it seemed like every pollster and pundit missed Colorado so badly? Did it really break so strongly on election eve? Was there a poll that showed an 8 pt lead for Allard (Wasn't that the final tally)?
8 posted on 11/07/2002 11:21:06 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Tennessean4Bush
President Bush made a big difference in this race, IMO. he campaigned hard for Allard. Allard started out behind in fundraising but caught up. He appeared to be running a not sufficiently aggressive campaign for a while and so it became fashionable to pick him to lose. Republicans had a good turnout operation and the Christian conservative vote in and around Colorado Springs was huge for Allard. I think the GOP turnout was simply much greater than expected in this race.
13 posted on 11/07/2002 11:26:03 AM PST by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessean4Bush
Polls are out-of-focus snapshots taken at the wrong time. I did hear a few people say things like "I don't like the Republicans, but I don't like the Estate Tax either." Some of these people will jump at the last minute. It's very hard to get a representative sample. Look at the misses by "Portrait of America" in the last election (which may replace the 1936 or 1948 elections as the pollster-boy warning.)

I don't think anyone predicted such a big blowout by Richardson.
14 posted on 11/07/2002 11:26:08 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessean4Bush
The polls also did not account for a huge GOP GOTV effort in the key states, project called "STOMP"...
41 posted on 11/07/2002 12:06:22 PM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessean4Bush
Any explanations on why it seemed like every pollster and pundit missed Colorado so badly? Did it really break so strongly on election eve? Was there a poll that showed an 8 pt lead for Allard (Wasn't that the final tally)?

While I worried about the race, I personally always felt Allard would win. His re-elect numbers were weak, yet he led in all but one or two polls where he trailed by a point. Allard never really generated much momentum, but neither did Strickland. And Strickland was already fairly well known, so he didn't have as much room to grow as some challengers. Allard had more money than Strickland, and he had already defeated Strickland in 1996. Colorado leans GOP anyways, and there are even more registered Pubbies now than in '96. And Gov. Owens was very popular and up for re-election. And having the President on his side didn't hurt either. I predicted Allard by 4 points (51-47%). Haven't seen the final margin yet.

51 posted on 11/07/2002 12:22:21 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson