If so, you aren't much on "reading for content."
LOL; I don't post vanities, Illbay; why should I go read rules upon which you justify YOUR "policing"? [Unless you want to count my one and only from a year ago for which I was bestowed an FR award. It's called "What's Wrong With Clinton (and Those Who Like Him)." FYI, it's about why people seek to justify their wrong behavior rather than change it.]
"Reading for content" is subjective. Apparently, you must be the subjective content judge; perhaps you do believe that some animals are more equal than others.
I'd have left you alone with your "vanity" post here, but, this just seems too hypocritical--as I previously said to you, you seem to post more "police work" than anything else.
I'm willing to go back to "live and let live" anytime.