Replies

Maybe I just don't get it, but doesn't the article suggest that the only use of creationism over darwinism is to control the unknowing masses who aren't in on the "game"?

That is to say that the belief in the existence of god or a religious belief is purely for the mindless, reasonless, unscientific masses. And that if darwinism is taught too much, control of those masses and the self realization that we are not all equal, would create a world of anarchists, hell bent (pardon the use of religious symbolism) on the advancment of their own pleasure and to hell (sorry again) with any other HUMAN ANIMAL thats gets in their way!

For don't the 'wild animals' on the planet eat eachother and kill eachother for there own advancement.

That's not to say that we as Humans and even in god's name haven't done the same. But do we not have the realization that it is wrong? And evan the senseable islamic peoples of the world realize that what happened on 9/11 is evil.

Evil is only evil when it is viewed from that point which separates us from the animals, our

judeo/christian/buddist/mohammadan/toaist/hindu

morality. (I'll be PC and apologise if I've left out any of you mindless masses)

That Morality is what separates us from the liberals in the world.

Humanism you may suggest is what truely recognises evil, but I don't see the proof in that. Isn't humanism the same mind controling system just rapped up in different clothing?