Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaGman
LOL - don't stop there. It's worth the read, I promise ;)
6 posted on 11/06/2002 10:24:22 PM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
Gross is much concerned with the interplay of science and politics--he is the co-author of the 1994 book, Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science--and is puzzled by the attacks on evolutionary biology by people whose political views he largely shares. Regarding Commentary's anti-Darwin article, he says he is mystified that the magazine "would publish the damned thing without at least passing it by a few scientists first."

Good points. The neo-Creationists and their twins, the Post-Modern-Deconstructionists continue to comment on science without checking with a few scientists first. Sokal's "Social Text" caper is a good example.

8 posted on 11/06/2002 10:33:10 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: general_re
Thanks for recomending a thorough reading. I'd written it off as a creationist harangue. I was very glad to see the author explained what Behe actually says in his book. And the Strauss stuff was very interesting.
12 posted on 11/06/2002 11:51:19 PM PST by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson