Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
I have sons, all of whom are hunks. They don't get phone calls from girls. In fact, they are/were rejected en masse by females when they call(ed) girls.

I never could figure it out. All three boys are conservative, Christian and Eagle Scouts. Miraculously, the eldest (founder of a dry fratnerity on his college campus) found the right girl (another "True Love Waits" prototype) and is getting married July 4. They will both be 22.

Boys #2 and #3 pine for girls who reject them, turn out to be lesbians, hate Republicans, etc.

The secret, I have found, is that alot of these girls are coming from homes with no parental supervision or core set of values. They are "sl*t" material, though I would never point that out directly to the boys.

Amazingly, as my parents would have predicted 40 years ago, "nice" girls do crop up and somehow G-d will find the right girl for someone at the right time.

Girls who have standards, one whom a parent would want a son to date, come from families who do not tolerate such behavior. They are still out there, probably wondering what's wrong with them, too.

19 posted on 11/06/2002 10:28:47 PM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MHT
I have sons, all of whom are hunks. They don't get phone calls from girls. In fact, they are/were rejected en masse by females when they call(ed) girls. I never could figure it out.

-----------------------------------

I'll figure it out for you. What is taking place today is sex, not personal involvement. Many, probably most, woment today can screw the football team with bravado, but can not engage in personal intimacy or involvement. If your sons are worth a damn it will scare the hell out of these women.

An idiot they can shack up with for a night won't require anything from them and won't scare them.

Sexually active women are required to adopt the self-protective measure of engaging in emotional distance from men in order to preclude getting hurt in their serial disposable relationships. Any man attractive enough to threaten that defense creates fear.

Men sense that emotional distance and toughness on to part of today's sexually liberated women and don't want them for more than a night. Involvement with them is emotional suicide.

30 posted on 11/06/2002 11:58:11 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: MHT
FWIW, I have a 17-year-old, and she is not allowed to phone guys, unless it has to do with scheduling that cannot be handled any other way, and only then with my intervening dispensation. She used to grouse some about it b/c her friends were allowed to do so--and she goes to a Christian school. Now, though, she doesn't complain and I think she's beginning to see the freedom that comes from not being the aggressor.
53 posted on 11/07/2002 9:45:29 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: MHT
Interesting experience. My own theory is that in modern culture, sensible folks are waiting longer to locate their true loves. Hitching up earlier than the 20's doesn't make sense like it used to.
139 posted on 11/07/2002 2:05:20 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: MHT
I have grown tired myself of trying to find someone to date...it seems when I do find someone that is gorgeous and a good person as well, right before I try to do something about my feelings, somebody else gets in the way and becomes her boyfriend real fast.

I am trying not to aim so high; I found a really sweet, Christian, conservative girl that is real cute. All I can say is, I hope she is interested, but I would be surprised.
167 posted on 11/07/2002 4:40:30 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson