Replies

Well secretagent, it's kinda in the same vien as what Craig Kilborn said on his stupid show concerning our -- a sitting -- POTUS??
Only what was said above was somewhere around 1x10⁶ LESS suggestive of anything meaningful; if, it were suggestive, a'tall.
~Suggestive to anyone other than you, that is.
Understand?

Know what I think?
Maybe your mainspring's a tad tight.
The question then becomes, "why"?
What's your motive for seeing these "threats"?
You're not thinking of doing anything stupid -- as inspired by, "those words" -- are you?

I mean, let me clarify this for you, OK?
There's trouble & then, there's looking for trouble.

...~eh?

I happen to agree with secretagent. garyhope's comments were definitely in the grey area when it comes to threats of violence. His statement was suggestive of desiring the very violent action he was deploring.

And there's no place for such comments in a respectable forum.

Well secretagent, it's kinda in the same vien as what Craig Kilborn said on his stupid show concerning our -- a sitting -- POTUS??

Don't remember exactly, something about a crosshairs superimposed...yes, in the same vein.

Only what was said above was somewhere around 1x106 LESS suggestive of anything meaningful; if, it were suggestive, a'tall. ~Suggestive to anyone other than you, that is. Understand?

It suggested assassinating Hollywood celebrities. Perhaps you disagree. Give me your alternative interpretation.

Know what I think? Maybe your mainspring's a tad tight.

Insult - not argument.

The question then becomes, "why"? What's your motive for seeing these "threats"?

Perhaps you see a metaphorical meaning for "assassinates", rather than the literal one I saw. Please share.

You're not thinking of doing anything stupid -- as inspired by, "those words" -- are you?

Indeed no.

I mean, let me clarify this for you, OK? There's trouble & then, there's looking for trouble. ...~eh?

Please expand. I don't see your point.