Stars risk popularity for politics

USA Today ^ | November 6, 2002 | Michael Medved

[Cindy]

re post #32:
GOOGLE SEARCH Term: "garyhope"
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22garyhope%22&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&filter=0

FYI

[scan58]

The other day my 11 year old son asked if I thought his math teacher was a "democratic tree hugging liberal."

Well, do you?

[Notforprophet]

Wow, I guess you're more of an _sshole than I thought. What are you here for, if you can't argue a point with someone without acting like a jerk?

[stuartcr]

I work with the govt. on a military base, and no one here was talking about any of the elections.

[Landru]

"What are you here for, if you can't argue a point with someone without acting like a jerk?"

Usually to talk conservative politics.
Plus, I find it amusing looking for the occasional shill among [us] who's here to drive wedges in between those of my kind using all manner of tricks.

Notice, I didn't ask you, "why" you're here?
I'm afraid you wouldn't like the reasoning behind my not asking that question.

"Wow, I guess you're more of an _sshole than I thought."

Well who's fault is that?
If you'd asked beforehand, I would've glady provided you *references* attesting to that much.

I mean after all?

...you "are" the one & only, "Notforprophet," eh? {~genuflecting~} ;^)

[Notforprophet]

"Usually to talk conservative politics."

But apparently not on this thread, huh? It seems you've decided to just be a pompous ass on this thread.

[ozzymandus]

Most of these leftist "celebs" are unbalanced narcissists with below-normal IQs ( see Barbra Streisand) who crave attention and intellectual validation. A more interesting question is who plants these treasonous ideas in their tiny minds? Remember the 30's and 40's when the Hollywood "elite" though it was "intellectual" to be a member of the communist party?

[Landru]

"But apparently not on this thread, huh?"

I spoke my peace on the thread, neighbor.

Also have tried to be as polite as I could with you; by, sending you one *hint* after another relaying one simple message.
I do not care discussing what day of the week it is with you.
All to no avail; &, by your tenacity to not leave this alone?
I think my judgement was spot-on, too; No one ever "wins" an argument with, or, "tells" Notforprophet a damned thing.

I don't trust you; not now, not tomorrow, not ever.
You have a Liberal-Socialist *feel*; &, whether you are a 'Rat or not I couldn't care less, at this point.
As far as I'm concerned, that's all there is to it.

But I -- apparently -- simply cannot reach you through the U.S.Mail on that one, fine point.
Can I?

"It seems you've decided to just be a pompous ass on this thread."

Just to you, pal; just to you.

I find you to be an arrogant SOB, you know that?
You tried your, "in-your-face" approach with me & it didn't wash.

Call it, "bad chemistry."
Call it a, "misunderstnding."
Call it whateverinthehell you want.

...just leave me be; understand?

[Notforprophet]

Also have tried to be as polite as I could with you...

That's what you call polite? I think you're protests of civility ring a little hollow, since it was your smarmy "So what?" comment that started all this B.S.

...just leave me be; understand?

I've never been happier to oblige another Freeper.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

The recent ratings collapse for NBC's acclaimed program, The West Wing, so obviously coincides with the edgy, insistent, anti-war activism of the show's star, Martin Sheen, that letter writers to USA TODAY and other ordinary Americans have hastened to point out the connection.

Heeheeheeheeheeheehee....

[arual]

Michael Medved will be back in the Seattle market starting Jan. 2, 2003 on 770AM from noon till three. It's a 50,000 watt powerhouse.