Your unfounded personal attacks are self-evidently erroneous.
The very fact that you now see the need for such a law shows that my objections to the proposed system, far from being "tin-foil-hat delusion", are quite accurate. If they were really "dishonest", then it is that same dishonesty with which you are now agreeing.
On that one item you have shown that dishonesty knows no bounds. That is but one of several statements you put forth that has been stricken from the record of your accumulated degree of dishonesty over several posts. So it came down a bit. The accumulation is much more than just that one need for a law that prohibits the HHS from putting out a dishonest poverty level number. Which it wasn't until I mentioned a the possibility that it entered your thinking that a law could thwart that possibility. If I'm wrong and you did think of it earlier but chose not to mention it probably because to mention it would thwart your agenda -- which I have no doubt you have not honestly stated.
Zon: You demonstrated your intent to deceive the reader. Thus rendering yourself not to be trusted or respected because you disrespect the reader. You probably think you can mislead and try to deceive the reader and that they should just comply with you and answer your questions or take you seriously. You deserve no person's attention in a discussion. Scorn. That's what you deserve. 936
Technogeeb: Your lies and personal attacks do nothing to refute the clear flaws in the system you are advocating. Government handouts to every household in the United States (the "prebate" mechanism) is socialism. To claim that it is otherwise is a lie. And since that system allows an unelected bureaucrat to determine the value of those handouts (with no additional action by Congress once the system is enacted), the only thing preventing it from becoming pure communism is the goodwill of the bureaucrats. 939
Your comments are on record; I'm glad to let the reader juxtaposition our comments.